Neighbourhood renovation concept
https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2023.3.2
Abstract
Introduction. For many decades there have already been attempts, and sometimes very successful, to create unique urban areas. But these areas were developed mainly as single variants on the formation of urban environment. Basically, they built areas of multi-story buildings according to the average requirements for the comfort of the urban environment. In the modern world, these areas no longer meet the requirements of living and require renovation in accordance with the modern concepts of comfortable living. A study based on Russian and foreign urban planning projects of renovation of areas with mass multi-story buildings is presented.
Materials and methods. Based on the analysis of domestic and foreign urban planning experience in the formation of comfortable living environment in the districts and neighbourhoods of large cities, a conceptual project of comprehensive renovation of urban areas of mass construction of 1960s–2000s is proposed.
Results. On the example of the Lesoparkovaya metro area the concept of renovation of the area, creation of more comfortable living environment, attraction of holidaymakers, new residents, workers to new jobs to the areas by creating a structure — attractor with development of underground space is presented. Presented two concepts of this structure will attract people to visit the district and use public transport, namely — metro Lesoparkovaya, Butovskaya line.
Conclusions. The presented concept can serve as a baseline for the renovation of neighbourhoods with mass development. This requires a so-called attractor, which will attract certain segments of the population, as well as a comprehensive development of the whole neighbourhood. It is necessary that the concept of the neighbourhoods should not be repeated and should be unique. Therefore, everyone will be able to find a rest area, living and working area according to their interests.
About the Authors
A. V. Manko
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Arthur V. Manko — Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Soil Mechanics and Geotechnics
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
Scopus: 57199534645, ResearcherID: IUP-6915-2023
V. A. Vinogradova
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valeria A. Vinogradova — student
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
M. I. Voropaeva
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maria I. Voropaeva — student
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
A. A. Ganshina
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alina A. Ganshina — student
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
O. S. Matyukhova
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga S. Matyukhova — student
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
References
1. Rodionovsky A.N. Formation of a system of local urban centers based on existing metro stations. Innovations and Investments. 2022; 11:240-243. (rus.).
2. Chekmeneva D.A. Shaping the identity of cultural and leisure centers in residential areas of Moscow. Science, education and experimental design in MARKhI : abstracts of the international scientific-practical conference. 2018; 607-608. (rus.).
3. Egorova I.N., Zubkov V.N. To the question of the development of transport-transfer hubs. Almanac of World Science. 2016; 3-1(6):84-90. (rus.).
4. Improvement and renovation. Approaches and problems. Moscow, Publishing house “A-Print”, 2018; 268. (rus.).
5. Ashimin A.V., Shestopalova N.V. Problems of Russian urban planning XX–XXI centuries in the context of cultural and civilizational decay of post-industrial society. Innovative development of science: fundamental and applied problems : monograph. Petrozavodsk, International Center for Scientific Partnership “New Science” (IP Ivanovskaya Irina Igorevna), 2021; 269-304. DOI: 10.46916/18052021-3-978-5-00174-233-3 (rus.).
6. Ovsyannikova V.E. Parallels in mass construction 1920s–1950s (settlement “Sokol” and the 9th quarter of Novye Cheremushki). Mesmakherov Science — 2019 research papers of graduate students and students. Materials of international scientific and practical conference. St. Petersburg, KultInform-Press, 2019; 330-333. (rus.).
7. Gorlov V. Novie Cheremushki. Transition to mass introduction into the microdistrict system in the USSR in 50–60s of XX century. Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: History and Political Sciences. 2014; (2):61-68. (rus.).
8. Bobkova I.A. Unification of schools. Will the economy win the capital education? Concepts. 2016; 1(35):65-77. (rus.).
9. Mitryaev E.A., Popov A.V. Prospects for reconstruction of the 9th quarter of new Cheryomushki with a change in function. Ecology of urbanized areas. 2022; 1:80-85. DOI: 10.24412/1816-1863-2022-1-80-85 (rus.).
10. Potashova M.D., Tsitman T.O. Integrated development of urban areas. Renovation of the microdistrict. Engineering and Construction Bulletin of the Caspian Sea. 2019; 2(28):40-50. (rus.).
11. Zazulya V.S., Lobanov Yu.N., Rusanov G.E., Volkov V.I. Tactical urbanism as a method for rapid “renovation” of bedroom areas of the city. Bulletin of Civil Engineers. 2019; 5(76):5-9. DOI: 10.23968/1999-5571-2019-16-5-5-9 (rus.).
12. Alov I.N. African-American Ghettos: Characteristics and Typology. Urban Studies and Practices. 2018; 3(1):(10):63-77. DOI: 10.17323/usp31201863-77 (rus.).
13. Fedchenko I.G. “Community Center” as a new type of public architecture in the living environment. Modern Architecture of the World. 2020; 1(14):248-262. DOI: 10.25995/NIITIAG.2020.81.27.011 (rus.).
14. Keresztely K. Urban Renewal as a Challenge for European Urban Development in the 21st century. Proceeding in the European urban fabric in the 21st century. 2012. URL: https://www.citego.org/bdf_fiche-document-532_en.html
15. Denisova E.L. Foreign experience in the implementation of renovation programs: a comparative analysis. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg Law Academy. 2022; 4(57):35-38. (rus.).
16. Li G. Renovation of Shantytowns and Construction of New Communities. The Urban Book Series. 2021; 121-152. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-74544-8_8
17. Abdulova I.T. New neighborhoods of Irkutsk: between the suburbs and the “bedroom community”. “Suburban revolution” in the regional cross-section: peripheral urban areas in the post-Soviet space : collection of abstracts of international scientific conference. Ulan-Ude, Buryat Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2019; 92-97. DOI: 10.31554/978-5-7925-0571-1-2019-1-92-97 (rus.).
18. Tsybaikin A.A. Public spaces near metro stations in peripheral districts of Moscow. Architecture and modern information technology. 2021; 2(55):219-228. DOI: 10.24412/1998-4839-2021-2-219-228 (rus.).
19. Korolevsky K.Y., Egorychev O.O., Zertsalov M.G., Konyukhov D.S. Basic principles of formation of the program of complex development of Moscow underground space. Metro and tunnels. 2007; 6:34-35. (rus.).
20. Kashef M. Residential developments in small-town America: assessment and regulations. City, Territory and Architecture. 2017; 4(1). DOI: 10.1186/s40410-017-0070-4
21. Garvin A. The American city: what works, what doesn’t. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2002; 584.
22. Maksimov S.N. Integrated development of territories and its bottlenecks. Real Estate: Economics, Management. 2023; 1:54-58. DOI: 10.22337/2073-8412-2023-1-54-58
23. Sabyna E.N., Sabyn M.N. Renovation as a form of urban areas improvement. Interactive Science. 2018; 11(33):54-56. DOI: 10.21661/r-473692
24. Schindler S., Kanai J.M., Bay J.D. Deindustrialisation and the politics of subordinate degrowth: The case of Greater Buenos Aires, Argentina. Urban Studies. 2023; 60(7):1212-1230. DOI: 10.1177/00420980221142706
25. Shahraki A.A. Renovation programs in old and inefficient neighborhoods of cities with case studies. City, Territory and Architecture. 2022; 9(1). DOI: 10.1186/s40410-022-00174-1
26. Hall P. Cities of tomorrow: an intellectual history of urban planning and design since 1880. Hoboken, NJ, Wiley-Blackwell. 2014; 644.
Review
For citations:
Manko A.V., Vinogradova V.A., Voropaeva M.I., Ganshina A.A., Matyukhova O.S. Neighbourhood renovation concept. Construction: Science and Education. 2023;13(3):29-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2023.3.2
Views:
357
Email this article 
