Preview

Construction: Science and Education

Advanced search

Experience in forming the scientific apparatus and structure of PhD thesis

https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2023.3.8

Abstract

Introduction. The article discusses the requirements for PhD thesis in accordance with the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation and the state standard. The authors consider the issues regarding the formation of the scientific apparatus, which graduate students face at different stages of the dissertation writing, and draw attention to the need to proceed from the peculiarities of the scientific school and the requirements of the dissertation council. It also describes the experience of formation of the scientific apparatus of the PhD thesis on speciality 05.02.22 “Organization of production (construction)”, based on the principles and approaches of the scientific supervisor, professor, Doctor of Technical Sciences Lapidus Azari Abramovich, examples are given in the scientific specialities 2.1.14 “Management of the life cycle of construction objects”, 2.1.7 “Technology and organization of construction”.

Materials and methods. To form recommendations, a literature review, systematization and generalization of experience in conducting scientific research and preparing a dissertation are performed; for clarity and demonstration of the proposed approaches, the recommendations are accompanied by an example of the formation of a scientific apparatus for a fictional and probably impossible PhD thesis.

Results. Recommendations on the formation of the scientific apparatus are given, including the sequence of work, the choice of the research topic, the statement of a scientific problem, the definition of the purpose and objectives of the research, the planning of the research results and their scientific novelty, the theoretical and practical significance of the research results, the formation of the structure of the scientific qualification work.

Conclusions. The experience of formation of the scientific apparatus of PhD thesis considered in the article can be used in conducting scientific research and the formation of scientific qualification work in various scientific specialties.

About the Authors

A. V. Zagorskaya
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation

Angelina V. Zagorskaya — Candidate of Technical Sciences, Teacher of the Department of Technologies and Organizations of Construction Production

26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337

ID RSCI: 998363



A. A. Lapidys
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation

Azariy A. Lapidys — Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, head of the Department of Technologies and Organizations of Construction Production

26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337

Scopus: 57192378750



References

1. Zhukova G.S., Gaponenko A.V. Training of scientific and scientific-pedagogical personnel of the highest qualification. Scientific notes of the Russian State Social University. 2011; 2(90):4-1EDN NXZOXV. (rus.).

2. Karavaeva E.V., Kostenko O.A., Malandin V.V., Mosicheva I.A. PhD programs as a basic tool of human capacity building in Russian science. Higher Education in Russia. 2022; 31(1):9-23. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-1-9-23 (rus.).

3. Matushansky G.U., Zavada G.V., Matushanskaya Yu.G. Barriers impeding postgraduate training completion and dissertation submission and defense. Higher Education in Russia. 2019; 28(8-9):55-66. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-8-9-55-66. EDN PVWBJN. (rus.).

4. Zerchaninova T.E., Tarbeeva I.S. Problems of scientific and educational activities of postgraduate students. Research Result. Sociology and Management. 2019; 5(3):37-48. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2019-5-3-0-3 (rus.).

5. Protasov V.N. Some problems of defence of the dissertations in modern Russian jurisprudence. State and Law. 2013; 5:16-23. EDN QLIOKP. (rus.).

6. Gusakov A.A., Bogomolov Yu.M., Brekh-man A.I., Vaganyan G.A., Vainshtein M.S., Vladimirsky S.R. et al. Systems engineering of construction. Moscow, Publishing house of the Association of Construction Universities, 2004; 320. EDN UBCQYB. (rus.).

7. Lapidus A.A. Systematic fundamentals of automation of design of organizational structures of large-scale construction. Moscow, 1997. (rus.).

8. Tamrazyan A.G. Methodological basis for preparing a scientific qualification work (dissertation) in construction sciences : textbook. Moscow, Publishing house MISI–MGSU, 2020; 23(rus.).

9. Radoutsky V.Yu. Fundamentals of scientific research : textbook. Belgorod, Belgorod State Technological University (BSTU) named after V.G. Shukhova, 2008; 13EDN: QWRNZV. (rus.).

10. Lbova L.V., Nokhrina T.I. Methodology for organizing research work : educational and methodological complex. 2013. (rus.).

11. Matushansky G.U., Bakeeva R.F., Suleymanova A.R., Merzlikina L.I. Algorithm for preparing a candidate’s dissertation for defense through postgraduate study. Bulletin of the Kazan State Energy University. 2010; 3(6):146-153. EDN NDXQDL. (rus.).

12. Fayzulina E.A. Preparation of a dissertation. Business. Education. Right. Bulletin of the Volgograd Institute of Business. 2008; 5:178-183. EDN TBQBOD. (rus.).

13. Komissarova E.G. Methodology for writing a candidate’s dissertation. Legal Science and Law Enforcement Practice. 2006; 1(1):116-12EDN: KWQGHD. (rus.).

14. Gromyko V.V. Thesis writing methodology. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2016; (3):3-19. DOI: 10.21686/2413-2829-2016-3-3-19 (rus.).

15. Mamaev A.V., Gorkova I.V. Methodological instructions for performing, writing and designing a scientific qualification work (candidate’s dissertation). Orel, Orel State Agrarian University named after N.V. Parakhina, 2020; 20. EDN: IMTGNO. (rus.).

16. Kobayashi S., Emmeche C. What makes a good PhD thesis? Norms of science as reflected in written assessments of PhD theses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2023; 1-15. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2023.2200917

17. Kumar V., Kaur A., Sanderson L.J. PhD orals from the convenors’ perspective: Implications for academics and candidates. International Journal for Academic Development. 2022; 1-13. DOI: 10.1080/1360144x.2022.2051516

18. McAlpine L., Skakni I., Pyhältö K. PhD experience (and progress) is more than work: life-work relations and reducing exhaustion (and cynicism). Studies in Higher Education. 2022; 47(2):352-366. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2020.1744128

19. Phillips E., Johnson C. How to Get a PhD : a handbook for students and their supervisors 7e. McGraw-Hill Education (UK), 2022.

20. Zagorskaya A.V. Improving scientific and technical support of design solutions for organizing the construction of unique objects : dissertation ... candidate of technical sciences. Moscow, 2022; 17(rus.).

21. Makarenko S.I. Directory of scientific terms and notations. St. Petersburg, High technology, 2019; 254. (rus.).


Review

For citations:


Zagorskaya A.V., Lapidys A.A. Experience in forming the scientific apparatus and structure of PhD thesis. Construction: Science and Education. 2023;13(3):147-164. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2023.3.8

Views: 379


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2305-5502 (Online)