Friction area size of the friction bolted connection
https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2024.1.4
Abstract
Introduction. In the normative method of calculation of joints of steel elements on high-strength bolts, the main influence on the bearing capacity of the joint is the bolt tension force and the friction coefficient, while the width of the plates to be connected is not taken into account, normative documents regulate the bolt spacing. The task of determining the influence of the width of steel plates on the load-bearing capacity of the connection elements was set. For this purpose, several butt joints of plates with double-sided overlays made of hot-rolled steel grade St3sp5 according to GOST 19903–2015 were manufactured. One of the butt plates is made of different widths and is fastened with one bolt so that the exhaustion of bearing capacity occurs in this section. After that, the joint is stretched and brought to the limit state on a breaking machine.
Materials and methods. 6 sets of friction joint with double-sided overlay on high-strength bolts with different width of the investigated butt plate — 50; 60; 70; 80; 90; 100 mm were made. The plates are connected by a high-strength bolt set of strength class 10.9 of size M14. The surface of the plates was sandblasted. An Instron 1000HDX tensile testing machine was used to determine the shear force.
Results. The bearing capacity of joints with different widths of the plates to be joined was determined, the results obtained were compared with the calculated theoretical values of bearing capacity, the shape and size of the friction area were determined. Three specimens were brought to failure, it was revealed that failure occurs as a result of exhaustion of tensile strength of the plates, as well as plate gouging as a result of buckling of the joined elements.
Conclusions. It was found that the size of the friction zone is 2.1–2.3 of the hole diameter, the bearing capacity of the joint does not depend on the width of the elements.
About the Authors
A. A. VasilkinRussian Federation
Andrey A. Vasilkin — Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Metal and Wooden Structures
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
ID RSCI: 636406, Scopus: 57192557109
G. V. Zubkov
Russian Federation
Georgiy V. Zubkov — postgraduate student of the Department of Metal and Wooden Structures
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
S. A. Prokaev
Russian Federation
Sergey A. Prokaev — master of the Institute of Economics and Management, School of Management and interdisciplinary researches
19 Mira st., Yekaterinburg, 620002
I. A. Vasilkin
Russian Federation
Ilya A. Vasilkin — student of the Institute of Hydraulic and Energy Construction
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
References
1. Tussnin A.R., Tikhonov S.M., Alekhin V.N., Belyaeva Z.V., Kudryavtsev S.V., Rybakov V.A., Nazmeeva T.V. et al. Design of steel structures. Part 1. Steel constructions. Materials and basic designing : handbook. Moscow, Pero Publishing House, 2020; 468. EDN BQNCPS. (rus.).
2. Bogdanov T.M. Connections of metal structures on high-strength bolts. Moscow, Transzheldorizdat, 1963; 112. (rus.).
3. Jiang C., Xiong W., Cai C.S., Zhu Y., Liu Z. Experimental study on the shear behavior of friction connections with corrosion damage. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2022; 197:107449. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107449
4. Katanina A.G., Shuvalov A.N., Kornev O.A., Sokolova E.V. Corrosion influence on properties of friction bolted joint of 6082-T6 alloy sheets. News of Higher Educational Institutions. Construction. 2022; 8(764):102-118. DOI: 10.32683/0536-1052-2022-764-8-102-118. EDN WSYRQK. (rus.).
5. Xie R., Golondrino J.C., MacRae G.A., Clifton G.C. Braced frame symmetrical and asymmetrical friction connection performance. Key Engineering Materials. 2018; 763:216-223. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.763.216
6. Aloisio A., Contento A., Boggian F., Tomasi R. Probabilistic friction model for aluminium–steel Asymmetric Friction Connections (AFC). Engineering Structures. 2023; 274:115159. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115159
7. Ferjaoui A., Yue T., Wahab M.A., Hojjati-Talemi R. Prediction of fretting fatigue crack initiation in double lap bolted joint using Continuum Damage Mechanics. International Journal of Fatigue. 2015; 73:66-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.11.012
8. Yan Z., Bagheri H., Ramhormozian S., Clifton G.C., Rangwani K., Dhakal R.P. et al. Three-storey configurable steel framed building incorporating friction based energy dissipaters: Structural configuration and instrumentation. New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Technical. 2021.
9. Martynov G.V., Monastyreva D.E., Makarov A.I., Morina E.A. Stress-strain state of friction joints with laser treatment of contact surfaces. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2019; 14:1:72-82. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935. 2019.1.72-82. EDN YWGLNR. (rus.).
10. Kovalenko A.I., Konin D.V., Nahvalnov P.V., Solovev D.V. Experimental study of the coefficient of friction in slip critical bolt joints. Structural Mechanics and Analysis of Constructions. 2022; 4(303):61-67. DOI: 10.37538/0039-2383.2022.4.61.67. EDN FCXHVY. (rus.).
11. Vedyakov I.I., Konin D.V., Nahvalnov P.V. Experimental study of friction bolted joints made of high-strength steels. Industrial and Civil Engineering. 2022; 7:24-33. DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019.2022.07.24-33. EDN NJLPIL. (rus.).
12. Solov’ev D.V., Konin D.V., Kovalenko A.I., Nakhval’nov P.V. Investigation of the work of joints on high-strength bolts. International Construction Congress. Science. Innovation. Goals. Construction. 2023; 202-205. DOI: 10.37538/2949-219Х-2023-202-205. EDN JVMDRM. (rus.).
13. Semenov A.A., Malyarenko A.A., Porivaev I.A., Safiullin M.N. Stress-strain behavior investigation of friction grip bolts in flange joints of trusses. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2014; 5(49):54-62. DOI: 10.5862/MCE.49.6. EDN SKHSCJ. (rus.).
14. Solodov N.V. Strength and deformability when crumpled in a bolted joint. Bulletin of Belgorod State Technological University named after. V.G. Shukhov. 2017; 1:82-87. DOI: 10.12737/23889. EDN XHLEJP. (rus.).
15. Ramhormozian S., Clifton G.C., Bergen B., White M., Macrae G.A. An experimental study on the Asymmetric Friction Connection (AFC) optimum installed bolt tension. NZSEE Annual Technical Conference and 15th World Conference on Seismic Isolation, Energy Dissipation and Active Vibration Control of Structures. 2017.
16. Cui Y., Yan Z., Wang X., Wang T. Experimental studies on slip friction device using symmetric friction connections. Structures. 2022; 44:1886-1897. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.09.005
17. Zajarnjj S.L., Gubanov Ja.V., Dem’janov D.V. Investigation of the mechanism of destruction of the friction bolt connection. Problems of research of systems and means of motor transport. 2017; 327-330. EDN YQIKHD.
18. Vasilkin A.A., Akhmetzyanov R.M. Identification of the torsion coefficient of bolts in slip-critical connections. Vestnik MGSU [Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture]. 2023; 18(3):379-390. DOI: 10.22227/19970935.2023.3.379-390 (rus.).
19. Vasilkin A., Akhmetzyanov R., Zubkov G., Vasilkin I. Experimental determination of the tightening coefficient of bolts according to the din standard. E3S Web of Conferences. 2023; 389:01080. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202338901080
20. Mascenik J., Coranic T. Experimental determination of the coefficient of friction on a screw joint. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(23):11987. DOI: 10.3390/app122311987
21. Wettstein A., Matthiesen S. Investigation of the thread coefficient of friction when impact tightening bolted joints. Forschung im Ingenieurwesen. 2020; 84(1):55-63. DOI: 10.1007/s10010-019-00392-z
Review
For citations:
Vasilkin A.A., Zubkov G.V., Prokaev S.A., Vasilkin I.A. Friction area size of the friction bolted connection. Construction: Science and Education. 2024;14(1):61-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2024.1.4