Filtration of the dam of the PSPP upper basin

Introduction. Ground dams and levees made of fine-grained soils are very common structures. Their widespread use in hydraulic engineering is explained by their cost-effectiveness due to the use of local materials. Clay soils are often used in such structures both for laying in the prisms of the dam and for the installation of anti-filtration elements. However, the laying of clay soil is associated with some restrictions related to the climatic conditions of construction. During the rainy period or during the period of snowfall and exposure to negative temperatures, the laying of such soil slows down due to the need to apply special measures, or stops altogether. This affects the time of construction and, ultimately, the cost of construction. The possibility of replacing part of the clay soil of the dam with sandy soil, the laying of which does not depend to such an extent on weather conditions, is considered. However, such a replacement requires additional verification of the structure in terms of its filtration capacity. A study of the filtration regime of the dam of the basin of the PSPP, built using all-weather technology of soil laying, was carried out. The parameters of the filtration flow for various design variants are obtained. Recommendations are given on the choice of an option for an underground dam. The enclosing dam of the PSPP basin made of mixed soils on a non-slip foundation with a height of 32.0 m, laying an upper slope of 1:6.0, and a lower slope of 1:3.5 was considered. 9 design options with various structural elements were considered.

Materials and methods. Calculations of soil dam filtration for steady state and unsteady dam regimes were carried out using the numerical finite element method in the local variational formulation using the FILTR software package.

Results. As a result of the research, the parameters of the filtration flow were obtained for the considered variants of the earthwork design: the position of the depression curve, the values of the filtration flow rate and the gradient. Recommendations on the choice of design are made.

Conclusions. Studies have shown that it is possible to use mixed soil laid using all-weather technology in the prisms of a soil dam instead of part of the clay soil when they are layered. At the same time, the filtration regime of the structure together with the foundation does not cause concern.

1. Adamo N., Al-Ansari N., Sissakian V., Laue J., Knutsson S. Dam safety problems related to seepage. Journal of Earth Sciences and Geotechnical Engineering. 2020; 10(6):191-239.

2. Fattah M.Y., Omran H.A., Hassan M.A. Behavior of an earth dam during rapid drawdown of water in reservoir — case study. International Journal of Advanced Research. 2015; 3(10):110-122.

3. López-Acosta N.P., Sánchez M.A., Pereira J. Soil Solution, G. Auvinet J.-M. Pereira. Assessment of exit hydraulic gradients at the toe of levees in water drawdown conditions. Scour and Erosion. 2014; 171-181. DOI: 10.1201/b17703-21

4. Stark T.D., Jafari N.H., Zhindon J.S.L., Baghdady A. Unsaturated and transient seepage analysis of San Luis dam. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 2017; 143(2). DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001602

5. Vandenberge D.R. Total Stress rapid drawdown analysis of the Pilarcitos dam failure using the finite element method. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering. 2014; 8(2):115-123. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-014-0249-7

6. Bellendir E.N., Ivashintsov D.A., Stefanishin D.V. et al. Probabilistic methods for assessing the reliability of soil hydraulic structures. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg, JSC VNIIG named after B.E. Vedeneeva. 2003. (rus.).

7. Aniskin N.A., Sergeev S.A. The effect of draw-off on filtration regime of earth-fill dam. International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering. 2022; 18(1):40-50. DOI: 10.22337/2587-9618-2022-18-1-40-50

8. Banichuk N.V., Makeev E.V. Variational method for non-classical problems of mechanics with constraints based on finite elements approximations and local variations. PNRPU Mechanics Bulletin. 2017. DOI: 10.15593/perm.mech/2017.3.03

9. Chernous’ko F.L. A local variation method for the numerical solution of variational problems. USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics. 1965; 5(4):749-754. EDN VRTIIV. (rus.).

10. Development of research on filtration theory in the USSR. Moscow, Nauka, 1969; 545. (rus.).

11. Shestakov V.M. Determination of hydrodynamic forces in earthen structures and slopes when water levels fall. Questions of filtration calculations of hydraulic structures : collection. VODGEO. 1956; 2. (rus.).

12. Muskat M. The flow of homogeneous fluids through porous media. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1937; 763. (rus.).

13. Anakhaev K.N. About filtration account the crosspiece. Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations. 2011; 23(2):148-158. EDN RXPMLV. (rus.).

14. Petrichenko M.R., Zaborova D.D., Kotov E.V., Musorina T.A. Weak solutions of the crocco boundary problems. St. Petersburg Polytechnical University Journal: Physics and Mathematics. 2018; 11(3):27-38. DOI: 10.18721/JPM.11303. EDN VBMEZB. (rus.).

15. Chapman T.G., Dressler R.F. Unsteady shallow groundwater flow over a curved impermeable boundary. Water Resources Research. 1984; 20(10):1427-1434. DOI: 10.1029/WR020i010p01427

16. Okeke A.C.U., Wang F. Critical hydraulic gradients for seepage-induced failure of landslide dams. Geoenvironmental Disasters. 2016; 3(1). DOI: 10.1186/s40677-016-0043-z

17. Vandenberge D.R. Total stress rapid drawdown analysis of the Pilarcitos dam failure using the finite element method. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering. 2014; 8(2):115-123. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-014-0249-7

18. Billstein M. Development of a numerical model of flow through embankment dams. Department of Environmental Engineering. Lulea University of Technology, Lulea, Sweden, 1998; 59.

19. Yuan S., Zhong H. Three dimensional analysis of unconfined seepage in earth dams by the weak form quadrature element method. Journal of Hydrology. 2016; 533:403-411. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.034

20. Yang J., Yin Z.Y., Laouafa F., Hicher P.Y. Modeling coupled erosion and filtration of fine particles in granular media. Acta Geotechnica. 2019; 14(6):1615-1627. DOI: 10.1007/s11440-019-00808-8

21. Al-Labban S. Seepage and stability analysis of the earth dams under drawdown conditions by using the finite element method. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2018; 6157. URL: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/6157

22. Hu S., Zhou X., Luo Y., Zhang G. Numerical simulation three-dimensional nonlinear seepage in a pumped-storage power station: case study. Energies. 2019; 12(1):180. DOI: 10.3390/en12010180

23. Mualem Y. A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resources Research. 1976; 12(3):513-522. DOI: 10.1029/WR012i003p00513

24. Van Genuchten M.T. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 1980; 44(5):892-898. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x

25. Kosugi K. General model for unsaturated hydraulic conductivity for soils with lognormal pore-size distribution. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 1999; 63(2):270-277. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1999.03615995006300020003x