Variable approaches to assessing manufacturability when producing work on construction systems

Introduction. At present, in scientific research, manufacturability of various types: manufacturability of building structures, manufacturability of design solutions, manufacturability of work production and manufacturability of operation of buildings and structures — are determined by various quantitative and qualitative indicators. These indicators form a set of evaluation criteria that allows assessing the level of manufacturability of building systems at various stages. Approaches to assessing manufacturability can vary depending on the initial indicators of manufacturability and the goals of the final result.

Materials and methods. The paper is based on the study of variable approaches to assessing manufacturability in the construction of building systems, based on the application of factor models of deterministic analysis. The following key factor models are considered: additive, multiplicative, multiple and mixed (combined). Variations of the resulting indicator — the indicator of manufacturability, based on these models when considering factor features in absolute and relative values are established and analyzed.

Results. The completed systematization of variable approaches to technological assessment can serve as a basis for modelling the level of technological effectiveness of construction systems at various stages of the life cycle depending on the factorial characteristics of the processes, as well as as a basis for the formation of a methodological base for a comprehensive assessment of technological effectiveness in the production of work on the installation of construction systems.

Conclusions. In the considered variable approaches, in most cases, the calculations of the indicators of manufacturability showed that the considered factor characteristics in the production of the device of building systems provide a mutual influence on the basis for calculating the resulting indicator. Within the framework of approaches based on the use of deterministic factor analysis in assessing manufacturability, the next stage is the study and analysis of the change in the indicator of manufacturability in the production of works on the device of building systems, as a result indicator.

1. Korol E.A., Dudina A.G., Petrosyan R.S. Systematization of the conceptual apparatus of manufacturability of building systems in scientific and methodological literature. Housing Construction. 2024; 7:32-37. DOI: 10.31659/0044-4472-2024-7-32-37. EDN QQXDUH. (rus.).

2. Kolchedantsev L.M., Ul’shin A.N. Improvement of complex constructability of steel lattice structure by means of enhancing the structural-technological conception. Housing Construction. 2015; 1:27-29. EDN RIEKIK. (rus.).

3. Verstov V.V., Gaido A.N. Justification of the choi-ce of rational methods for the construction of pile foundations based on the criterion of manufacturability in various construction conditions. Installation and Special Works in Construction. 2013; 4:6-12. (rus.).

4. Lebedev V.M., Lomtev I.A. Determination of the manufacturability of construction and reconstruction projects. Bulletin of Belgorod State Technological University Named After V.G. Shukhov. 2017; 11:80-83. DOI: 10.12737/article_5a001ab5b736a5.52602351. EDN ZUJXQB. (rus.).

5. Gaidukov P.V., Pugach E.M. The structure of the complex manufacturability of permanent formwork for slabs. The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2022; 14(1). EDN ERGZSV. (rus.).

6. Ulshin A.N. Research of quantity indicators of technological constructability at the erection of steel constructions. Bulletin of Civil Engineers. 2012; 2(31):148-154. EDN PAQQEX. (rus.).

7. Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z., Šliogerienė J., Vilutienė T. An integrated assessment of the municipal buildings’ use including sustainability criteria. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2021; 67:102708. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102708

8. Lebedev V.M. System quanta of complex manufacturability of building structures. Bulletin of Belgorod State Technological University Named After V.G. Shukhov. EDN ULFTRH. (rus.).

9. Lyalin D.A., Pugach E.M. Manufacturability of construction of reinforced concrete frames of multi-storey buildings. The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2022; 14(2):40. EDN EMIOFU. (rus.).

10. Sosunova D.Y., Karimov B.A. Determination of the optimal type of transport for transporting goods along the route Baku (Azerbaijan) — Shanghai (China) using the method of expert assessments. Bulletin of the Academy of Civil Aviation. 2023; 3(30):51-56. DOI: 10.53364/24138614_2023_30_3_51. EDN NXCSNX.

11. Kuzmina T.K., Samarin P.I., Shamanaeva L.K., Ledovskih L.I. Simulation of the design activity diversification of innovative enterprise abstract. Engineering journal of Don. 2023; 8(104):262-271. EDN PTYGUV. (rus.).

12. Gaidukov P.V., Pugach E.M. Features of the use of stay in place floor formwork. The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2022; 14(4):5. EDN APKXJP. (rus.).

13. Saimanova O.G., Byalkina E.Yu. Optimization of methods of organization of work in construction. Innovative strategies for the development of management in construction and urban management. 2018; 172-177. EDN XPGJJZ. (rus.).

14. Ivanov V.N., Trofimova L.S. Accounting for uncertainty of demand in modeling the relationship between machine parameters and the quality of technological processes in road construction. Construction and Road Machines. 2012; 3:25-28. EDN VIZVQF. (rus.).

15. Bogachkova L.Yu., Baybakova K.A. Application of the index method of factor analysis to studying the rates of territorial energy intensity increase (the case of macro-regions of the Russian Federation). Modern Economics: Problems and Solutions. 2020; 12(132):163-173. DOI: 10.17308/meps.2020.12/2501. EDN FKAALL.

16. Shchitov S.V., Kidyaeva N.P., Mitrokhina O.P., Kuznetsov E.E. Use of mathematical numerical methods in substantiating the choice of a grain harvesting equipment model. AgroEcoInfo. 2017; 2(28):8. EDN ZCQUPB. (rus.).

17. Petrov A.M., Antonova O.V. Methods of deterministic factor analysis. Kant. 2016; 1(18):123-128. EDN VRELZV. (rus.).

18. Zaynutdinova E.D. Factor analysis method in sales. Innovation & Investment. 2022; 11:193-195. EDN UQZMAS. (rus.).

19. Dinukova O.A., Gunko N.N. Factor analysis as a modeling tool in the digital economy. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. 2021; 441-447. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-47458-4_53

20. Mitev V.Ts. Approbation of the averaged method of chain substitutions for three and four multiples and multiplicative-multiples factor models. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2022; 26(6):166-174. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2022-26-6-166-174. EDN WVPYVZ. (rus.).

21. Mitev V. Averaged chain substitution method. Economic and Social Alternatives. 2020; 4:90-100. DOI: 10.37075/ISA.2020.4.09

22. Mitev V. Averaged chain substitution method — applicability, advantages, and disadvantages. Economic and Social Alternatives. 2021; 27(2):127-138. DOI: 10.37075/ISA.2021.2.08