Calculation of compressed thin-walled rods in accordance with current normative and technical documents of different countries
https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2025.3.2
Abstract
Introduction. The article deals with methods of determining the design values of the bearing capacity of a thin-walled rod experiencing compression deformation (taking into account the probable local buckling) according to domestic and European normative documents and the design standards of North America.
Materials and methods. Calculations for thin-walled cold-formed C-shaped steel sections were carried out. Methods such as collection and systematization of information data, theoretical generalization of materials obtained in the analysis of domestic and foreign normative and technical documents, comparative analysis were used.
Results. The comparison of methods for determining the load-bearing capacity of thin-walled rods under local buckling was made. The calculation algorithms are presented in tables. The results are summarized in unified tables.
Conclusions. Based on the analysis of results (taking as a reference for comparison the load-bearing capacity determined in accordance with SP 260.1325800.2016) a difference of 5 with EN 1993-1-3 and 12 % with AISI S100–16 was obtained. Graphs of correspondence between the load-bearing capacity and geometric characteristics of the cross-section (height, width and thickness) are shown. They give a visual representation of the difference in approaches to the development of normative and technical documents in different countries.
About the Authors
R. A. GatiatullinaRussian Federation
Regina A. Gatiatullina — graduate student
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
A. M. Ibragimov
Russian Federation
Alexander M. Ibragimov — Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
RSCI AuthorID: 704948, Scopus: 57189524528, ResearcherID: AFN-6830-2022
References
1. Kinzyabulatova D.F., Porivaev I.A., Nedo-seko I.V. Buckling analysis of c-shaped cold-formed profiles. News of the Kazan State University of Architecture and Engineering. 2022; 4(62):108-118. DOI: 10.52409/20731523_2022_4_108. EDN JLMWXF. (rus.).
2. Egorov A.V., Egorov V.N. Computational and experimental study of longitudinal stability of the thin-walled flat bar structure. Engineering Journal: Science and Innovation. 2023; 3(135). DOI: 10.18698/2308-6033-2023-3-2256. EDN VFTQTU. (rus.).
3. Chernyavskiy I.D. Buckling of steel thin-walled cold-formed sigma-type sections rods. Collection of competitive scientific works of students and graduate students: in 2 parts. Brest, BrSTU, 2022; 1:310-314. (rus.).
4. Sovetnikov D.O., Azarov A.A., Ivanov S.S., Rybakov V.A. Methods of calculation of thin-walled bars: statics, dynamics and stability. Alfabuild. 2018; 2(4):7-33. DOI: 10.34910/ALF.4.1. (rus.).
5. Zhang P., Shahria Alam M. Compression tests of thin-walled cold-formed steel columns with Σ-shaped sections and patterned perforations distributed along the length. Thin-Walled Structures. 2022; 174. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2022.109082
6. Tusnina O.A. The Features of Behaviour of a Thin-Walled Cold-Formed C-Purlin. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2014; 10:64-74. EDN SWJDYN. (rus.).
7. Schafer B.W., Peköz T. The behavior and design of longitudinally stiffened thin-walled compression elements. Thin-Walled Structures. 1997; 27(1):65-78. DOI: 10.1016/0263-8231(96)00016-x
8. Kayumov R.A. Postbuckling behavior of compressed bars with nonlinearly elastic supports. PNRPU Mechanics Bulletin. 2022; 3:23-31. DOI: 10.15593/perm.mech/2022.3.03. EDN OERASD. (rus.).
9. Rybakov V.A., Lalin V.V., Ivanov S.S., Aza-rov A.A. Coordinate functions quadratic approximation in V.I. Slivker’s semi-shear stability theory. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2019; 5(89):115-128. DOI: 10.18720/MCE.89.10. EDN VJZIUK.
10. Khodeeva V.A. Stability of a thin-walled plate within the limits of elasticity. Young Don Researcher. 2022; 5(38):61-65. EDN HIVJPU. (rus.).
11. Von Karman T., Sechler E.E., Donnell L. The strength of thin plates in compression. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 1932; 54(2):53-56. DOI: 10.1115/1.4021738
12. Winter G. Strength of thin steel compression flange. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers. 1947; 112(1):527-554. DOI: 10.1061/TACEAT.0006092
13. Schafer B.W., Peköz T. Computational modeling of cold-formed steel: characterizing geometric imperfections and residual stresses. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 1998; 47(3):193-210. DOI: 10.1016/S0143-974X(98)00007-8
14. Torabian S., Schafer B.W. Development and Experimental Validation of the Direct Strength Method for Cold-Formed Steel Beam-Columns. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2018; 144(10). DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002117
15. Anbarasu M. Structural performance of cold-formed steel composite beams. Steel and Composite Structures. 2018; 27(5). DOI: 10.12989/scs.2018.27.5.545
16. Zenkov E.V. Functional aspects of the c stud from light steel thin-walled structures for stability. International Research Journal. 2021; 3-1(105):54-59. DOI: 10.23670/IRJ.2021.105.3.009. EDN QKEEVM. (rus.).
17. Nadolski V., Dzerhachou M. Effective width method for thin-walled cold-formed elements in accordance with Eurocode 3. Herald of Polotsk State University. Series F. Civil Engineering. Applied Sciences. 2017; 8:105-111. EDN ZVZCYH. (rus.).
18. Zhang P., Shahria Alam M. Experimental investigation and numerical simulation of pallet-rack stub columns under compression load. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2017; 133:282-299. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.02.023
19. Jovanovic D., Zarkovic D., Dobric J. Design and application of cold-formed thin-walled members. Planning, design, construction and building renewal: scientific conference. 2018; 125-134.
20. Bezas M.Z., Demonceau J.F., Vayas I., Jaspart J.P. Compression tests on large angle columns in high-strength steel. Steel Construction. 2022; 15(1):43-47. DOI: 10.1002/stco.202100051
Review
For citations:
Gatiatullina R.A., Ibragimov A.M. Calculation of compressed thin-walled rods in accordance with current normative and technical documents of different countries. Construction: Science and Education. 2025;15(3):24-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2025.3.2







