Preview

Construction: Science and Education

Advanced search

Organizational and technological solutions for data centres construction under AI workloads: requirements, risks, and regulations

https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2025.4.11

Abstract

Introduction. The rapid growth of AI workloads has shifted the key constraints of data centres from floor space and air cooling to available connection power, heat removal capacity, and water infrastructure. AI-ready is becoming an inherent property of building design: decisions regarding liquid/immersion cooling schemes, heat recovery, redundancy, and commissioning programs must be made at early stages and formalized within design specifications and tolerances.

Materials and methods. A targeted review of publications was conducted, incorporating peer-reviewed papers and relevant standards (EN 50600, ASHRAE TC 9.9 guidelines, ISO/IEC 30134 series). Sources were thematically coded under the categories: “cooling/heat removal”, “power supply”, “water and ecology”, “site layout and configuration”, and “regulations and KPI”.
Analysis was performed as a mapping of “AI requirement → building solution → measurable parameter”, resulting in a correspondence matrix and a risk-mitigation framework structured as “risk → mitigation measure → KPI → acceptance method”. This approach effectively linked academic literature with practical engineering tolerances and testing procedures.

Results. The target architecture for high-density AI clusters requires implementation of liquid cooling circuits with readiness for immersion cooling, validated resilience of power supply against transient loads, establishment of water usage effectiveness (WUE) KPI on par with PUE, and design of interfaces for low-grade heat recovery. Efficiency is enhanced through modularity and factory-built modules, staged power ramp-up, and digital twin technologies. An integrated risk map and a regulatory compliance matrix are proposed, explicitly linking standards to design parameters and acceptance procedures.

Conclusions. “AI-readiness” emerges as the outcome of coordinated organizational and technological construction decisions. A management framework encompassing KPI budgets during design phase, a requirements-compliance matrix, and a stress-testing program ensures reproducibility of target metrics (PUE/WUE/ERE/ERF), control over schedule and cost, and accelerated achievement of designed computational capacity.

About the Authors

R. O. Samsonov
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation

Roman O. Samsonov — Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Scientific Director of the Laboratory of Organizational and Technological Systems for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Construction (OTS)

26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337



V. S. Lotkin
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation

Victor S. Lotkin — postgraduate student

26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337



References

1. Azarifar M., Arik M., Chang J.Y. Liquid cooling of data centers: A necessity facing challenges. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2024; 247:123112. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.123112

2. Kong R., Zhang H., Tang M., Zou H., Tian C., Ding T. Enhancing data center cooling efficiency and ability: A comprehensive review of direct liquid cooling technologies. Energy. 2024; 308:132846. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.132846

3. Mohammed N.M., El-Maghlany W.M., Elhelw M., Abdelaziz A.H. Performance improvement of high-density data center via two-phase liquid immersion cooling. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2025; 150:6. DOI: 10.1007/s10973-025-14006-0

4. Zhang Y., Fan C., Li G. Discussions of Cold Plate Liquid Cooling Technology and Its Applications in Data Center Thermal Management. Frontiers in Energy Research. 2022; 10. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2022.954718

5. Chen H., Li D. Current Status and Challenges for Liquid-Cooled Data Centers. Frontiers in Energy Research. 2022; 10. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2022.952680

6. Haghshenas K., Setz B., Blosch Y., Aiello M. Enough hot air: the role of immersion cooling. Energy Informatics. 2023; 6(1). DOI: 10.1186/s42162-023-00269-0

7. Stahlhut M., Sekulla M., Großöhme P., Auweter A., Urbaneck T. Data Centers With Direct Liquid-Cooled Servers: Experimental Analysis and Modeling. Energy Science & Engineering. 2025; 13(7):3605-3619. DOI: 10.1002/ese3.70116

8. Lu Z., Di Y., Di H., Li X., Chen Z., Zhao C. et al. Optimization of data center thermal management performance under failure mode of rack-level heat pipe backplane system. Building Simulation. 2025; 18(6):1377-1392. DOI: 10.1007/s12273-025-1271-5

9. Mytton D. Data centre water consumption. Npj Clean Water. 2021; 4(1). DOI: 10.1038/s41545-021-00101-w

10. Karimi L., Yacuel L., Johnson J.D., Ashby J., Green M., Renner M. et al. Water-energy tradeoffs in data centers: A case study in hot-arid climates. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2022; 181:106194. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106194

11. Lei N., Lu J., Shehabi A., Masanet E. The water use of data center workloads: A review and assessment of key determinants. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2025; 219:108310. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108310

12. Karimi L., Shinh R., Laisure-Pool C., Green M., Yacuel L., Ashby J. et al. Energy and water dynamics in data center cooling: Insights from a modeling study in hot-arid climates. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2025; 276:126802. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.126802

13. Pärssinen M., Wahlroos M., Manner J., Syri S. Waste heat from data centers: An investment analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2019; 44:428-444. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.023

14. Antal M., Cioara T., Anghel I., Gorzenski R., Januszewski R., Oleksiak A. et al. Reuse of Data Center Waste Heat in Nearby Neighborhoods: A Neural Networks-Based Prediction Model. Energies. 2019; 12(5):814. DOI: 10.3390/en12050814

15. Sun J., Wang S., Wang J., Tolbert L.M. Dynamic Model and Converter-Based Emulator of a Data Center Power Distribution System. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. 2022; 37(7):8420-8432. DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2022.3146354

16. Yuan X., Liang Y., Hu X., Xu Y., Chen Y., Kosonen R. Waste heat recoveries in data centers : a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2023; 188:113777. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113777

17. Khalid R., Wemhoff A.P., Khuc M., Nayar A.J., Schon S. Data Center Waste Heat Reuse: An Investment Analysis. ASME Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Buildings and Cities. 2025; 6(1). DOI: 10.1115/1.4067444

18. Gazzola V., Menoni S., Ghignatti P., Marini A., Mauri R., Oldani G. Analysis of Territorial Risks and Protection Factors for the Business Continuity of Data Centers. Sustainability. 2023; 15(7):6005. DOI: 10.3390/su15076005

19. Turek D., Radgen P. Optimized data center site selection — mesoclimatic effects on data center energy consumption and costs. Energy Efficiency. 2021; 14(3). DOI: 10.1007/s12053-021-09947-y

20. Radovanovic A., Chen B., Talukdar S., Roy B., Duarte A., Shahbazi M. Power Modeling for Effective Datacenter Planning and Compute Management. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. 2022; 13(2):1611-1621. DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2021.3125275

21. Corigliano O., Algieri A., Fragiacomo P. Turning Data Center Waste Heat into Energy: A Guide to Organic Rankine Cycle System Design and Performance Evaluation. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(14):6046. DOI: 10.3390/app14146046

22. Arzumanyan M., Calzado E.R., Lin N., Bahadur V., Das J., Ko T.L. et al. Geospatial suitability analysis for data center placement: A case study in Texas, USA. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2025; 131:106687. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2025.106687

23. Chang Q., Huang Y., Liu K., Xu X., Zhao Y., Pan S. Optimization Control Strategies and Evaluation Metrics of Cooling Systems in Data Centers : a Review. Sustainability. 2024; 16(16):7222. DOI: 10.3390/su16167222


Review

For citations:


Samsonov R.O., Lotkin V.S. Organizational and technological solutions for data centres construction under AI workloads: requirements, risks, and regulations. Construction: Science and Education. 2025;15(4):154-168. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2025.4.11

Views: 84

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2305-5502 (Online)