Optimal design of a large-span arched structure
https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2022.4.1
Abstract
Introduction.
Large-span structures are designed as entertainment and mass-use buildings, sports facilities, etc. A steel arched structure can be used as a covering for large-span structures. The issue of the rational design of large-span steel
arches, as well as the proper choice of the structural design and the analysis of its bearing capacity is relevant.
Materials and methods.
The covering of a tennis sports facility with the span of 108 m, that represents a double-hinged steel arch without tightening, arches with prestressed tightening and several lattice options are considered. The cross-section of structural elements was selected; the effect of prestressing on forces and displacements in the arch, as well as the amount of metal per structure were analyzed. The general stability of these arched structures was analyzed. Calculations were performed in the geometrically nonlinear formulation using the LIRA-SAPR software package.
Results.
It is determined that the weight of the arch, including the tightening and the lattice is smaller than the weight of the arch without the tightening. The amount of metal, used to make columns, can be reduced to simplify structural units due to the absence of gusset transfer from the arch with tightening to columns. The required prestressing value is set for the tightening to ensure the required rigidity of the arch. Several methods were used to determine the critical load at which the arch loses its stability in its plane: the analytical method, geometrically nonlinear calculation results, and the Stability mode implemented in LIRA-SAPR software package were employed. The critical load turned out to be higher for the arch with tightening.
Conclusions.
Following the above computations, a decision was made to use a double-hinged arch with prestressed tightening and a lattice as the covering of the sports facility. The values of the critical load that triggers the arch stability loss, obtained using the geometrical nonlinear finite-element analysis and the Stability mode, were quite close. Application of the analytical method resulted in an overestimated value of the critical load, which prevents it from being recommended for use.
About the Authors
Olga TusninaRussian Federation
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Metal and Timber Structures
- Scopus: 55975424400
- ResearcherID: U-7848-2018
Mikhail Postarnak
Russian Federation
postgraduate of the Department of Metal and Timber Structures
References
1. Eremeev P.G. Metal structures of roofs of unique large-span buildings. Industrial and Civil Engineering. 2007; 3:19-21. (rus.).
2. Krivoshapko S.N., Mamieva I.A. Outstanding spatial structures of the last 20 years. Assembly and Special Works in Construction. 2012; 12:8-14. (rus.).
3. Krivoshapko S.N. Suspention cable structures and roofs of erections. Construction of Unique Buildings and Structures. 2015; 7(34):51-70. (rus.).
4. Lazzari M., Majowiecki M., Vitaliani R.V., Saetta A.V., Nonlinear F.E. Analysis of Montreal Olympic Stadium roof under natural loading conditions. Engineering Structures. 2009; 31(1):16-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.010
5. Dushkevich K. The role of the high-span shell forms in architecture of public buildings. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. 2017; 4(41):163-178. (rus.).
6. Pashkova L.A., Denisova Yu.V. Evolution of long-span structures on the example of olympic facilities. The Bulletin of BSTU named after V.G. Shukhov. 2016; 11:88-94. DOI: 10.12737/22380 (rus.).
7. Belostotsky A.M., Britikov N.A., Goryachevsky O.S. Critical review of modern numerical modelling of snow accumulation on roofs with arbitrary geometry. International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering. 2021; 17(4):40-59. DOI: 10.22337/2587-9618-2021-17-4-40-59
8. Tominaga Y. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of snowdrift around buildings: Past achievements and future perspectives. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2018; 150:2-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2017.05.004
9. Semenov A.A., Demidova D.A., Nafikova A.A., Zimin S.S., Nikolaev D.I. Trial design of the large-span structure. Construction of Unique Buildings and Structures. 2018; 5(68):24-35. DOI: 10.18720/CUBS.68.3 (rus.).
10. Semenov A.A., Poryvaev I.A., Sofoyan S.V., Gilemkhanov R.A., Semenov S.A. Research of spatial metal roof of long-span sport arena. Construction of Unique Buildings and Structures. 2015; 4(31):58-81. (rus.).
11. Backer H.D., Outtier A., Bogaert Ph.V. Buckling design of steel tied-arch bridges. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2014; 103:159-167. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.09.004
12. Cai Y.Q., Ding W.S. Mechanical behavior analysis of long-span steel truss arch bridge based on static load test. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018; 392:062008. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/392/6/062008
13. Bradford M.A., Pi Y.-L. Flexural–torsional buckling of fixed steel arches under uniform bending. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2006; 62(1-2):20-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.02.012
14. Dou C., Jiang Z.Q., Pi Y.L., Gao W. Elastic buckling of steel arches with discrete lateral braces. Engineering Structures. 2018; 156:12-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.028
15. Lu H.W., Liu A.R., Pi Y.L., Huang Y.H., Bradford M.A., Fu J.Y. Flexural-torsional buckling of steel arches under a localized uniform radial-load incorporating shear deformations. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2019; 145(10). DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002407
16. Chen S.H., Chi M.Z., Fu X.M., Mao J.W., Ju J.S. Stability analysis of H-section steel arch considering effect of welding residual stress. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021; 1777(1):012035. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1777/1/012035
17. Grudev I.D., Simon N.Yu., Dvornikov V.A. Axle shape, design and calculation of arches stability. Industrial and Civil Engineering. 2008; 5:22-24. (rus.).
18. Pi Y.-L., Trahair N.S. In-plane buckling and design of steel arches. Journal of Structural Engineering. 1999; 125(11):1291-1298. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1999)125:11(1291)
19. Pi Y.-L., Trahair N.S. Non-linear buckling and postbuckling of elastic arches. Engineering Structures. 1998; 20(7):571-579. DOI: 10.1016/s0141-0296(97)00067-9
20. Kolokolov S.B. Method of choice of steel arch cross section with deformational calculation. Vestnik of the Orenburg State University. 2015; 5(180):151-154. (rus.).
21. Kolokolov S.B. The study of the process of deformation of the arched structure as a way to assess its stability. Vestnik of the Orenburg State University. 2010; 2(108):150-153. (rus.).
22. Dmitriev A.N., Semenov A.A., Lalin V.V. Stability of the equilibrium of elastic arches with a deformed axis. Construction of Unique Buildings and Structures. 2018; 4(67):19-31. DOI: 10.18720/CUBS.67.2 (rus.).
23. Tusnin A., Tusnina O. Analysis of supercritical behavior of rod systems. Proceedings of the METNET Seminar 2011 in Aarhus (Denmark). 2011; 160-169.
24. Zilenaite S. Comparative Analysis of the Buckling Factor of the Steel Arch Bridges. Engineering Structures and Technologies. 2019; 11(1):11-16. DOI: 10.3846/est.2019.8856
25. Gorev V.V. Steel structures. Vol. 2. Structures of the buildings. Moscow, High School, 2004; 528. (rus.).
Review
For citations:
Tusnina O., Postarnak M. Optimal design of a large-span arched structure. Construction: Science and Education. 2022;12(4):6-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2022.4.1