Management of urban public green spaces
https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2023.1.11
Abstract
Introduction. People want effective management and balanced development of urbanised systems. In a comprehensive social, economic and environmental research of human living conditions in the city, various kinds of sociological surveys of the population are applied and foresight sessions are held with subject matter experts to analyse the existing level of safety and comfort of residence. However, in the context of growing urbanized systems, there is an acute shortage of new methods, ways and tools of knowing them for the purpose of effective management and balanced development.
Materials and methods. The article presents aspects of the methodology for extracting and structuring knowledge of urban public green spaces in cities. The work is based on the paradigms of ontological engineering and knowledge management.
Results. Ontological engineering as a theory and methodology for developing ontologies is actively developing. However, the main success lies in the field of knowledge formalization technology, while the methodology for extracting and structuring knowledge is still under development. The problem of meaningful analysis of the subject area remains open, the relevance of research of which is confirmed by sustainable development goal 11, target 11.7: “by 2030 provide universal access to safe, available and inclusive green spaces and public spaces, especially for women amd children, older and disabled people”. The article describes the process of developing a taxonomy of expert knowledge about urban public green spaces in city. The taxonomy includes classes, subclasses, properties for subclasses and options for properties.
Conclusions. The results of the conceptualisation of knowledge of the subject can be used as elements in the construction of the knowledge graph framework. With appropriate refinement, the taxonomy can be in demand for scientific research, design of innovative services and intelligent systems used in urban planning and urban economy.
Keywords
urbanisation,
city,
urban planning,
urban economy,
green spaces,
knowledge management,
ontology,
taxonomy,
expert
About the Authors
Olga N. D’yachkova
Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (SPbGASU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Construction Technology
- ID RSCI: 750897
Alexander E. Mikhailov
Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (SPbGASU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Math
- ID RSCI: 793871
References
1. Mitiagin S.D. Methodological features of the preparation of territorial planning documents in modern conditions. Industrial and Civil Engineering. 2021; 8:59-68. DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019.2021.08.59-68 (rus.).
2. Krasnoshekova N.S. Strategy for improvement of environmental study territorial planning documents in development cities and agglomerations. Fundamental, exploratory and applied research of the RAASN on scientific support for the development of architecture, urban planning and the construction industry of the Russian Federation in 2016 : collection of scientific tr. RAASN. Moscow, 2017; 341-347. DOI: 10.22337/9785432302205-2017-341-347 (rus.).
3. Kochurov B.I., Ermakova Yu.I., Ivashkina I.V. Self-organization and self-development of urbogeosystems. Geography and Natural Resources. 2021; 42(3):225-231. DOI: 10.1134/S1875372821030094
4. Kochurov B.I., Ivashkina I.V., Ermakova Yu.I., Fomina N.V., Lobkovskaya L.G. Ecological and urban planning balance and prospects for development of the megalopolis of Moscow as the center of convergence. Ecology of Urban Areas. 2019; 3:65-72. DOI: 10.24411/1816-1863-2019-13065 (rus.).
5. Ilyichev V.A., Kolchunov V.I., Gordon V.A., Kormina A.A. Statistical relationships between indicators of favourable living environments in biosphere compatible cities. Vestnik MGSU [Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture]. 2021; 16(5):545-556. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2021.5.545-556 (rus.).
6. Tkachev V.N., Danilina N.V. The anthropic principle in the architecture of the universe. Ecology of Urban Areas. 2022; 2:81-89. DOI: 10.24412/1816-1863-2022-2-81-89 (rus.).
7. Kochurov B.I., Kulnev V.V., Tsvetkov I.V. Multifractal models of impact on the aquatic ecosystem: response, risk, management. Regional Geosystems. 2022; 46(1):71-80. DOI: 10.52575/2712-7443-2022-46-1-71-80 (rus.).
8. Lukinov V.A. Classification of living conditions in housing accommodations. Real Estate: Economics, Management. 2022; 2:74-78. URL: https://n-eu.iasv.ru/index.php/neu/article/view/81 (rus.).
9. Votsis A., Haavisto R. Urban DNA and sustainable cities: a multi-city comparison. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2019; 7:4. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00004
10. Telichenko V.I. The analysis of methodology of the assessment and expected indicators of ecological safety of atmospheric air in the Russian Federation for 2010–2020 years. XXV Polish – Russian – Slovak Seminar “Theoretical Foundation of Civil Engineering”, Chelyabinsk, May 19–20, 2016. Chelyabinsk, Elsevier Ltd, 2016; 736-740. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.235
11. Bakhareva O.V., Azhimov T.Z., Azhimova L.I. Urban Bio-social infrastructure as a patronized goods: institutional environment and structural changes. Vestnik MGSU [Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture]. 2022; 17(4):428-442. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2022.4.428-442.(rus.).
12. Telichenko V., Benuzh A., Mochalov I. Landscape architecture and green spaces in Russia. MATEC Web of Conferences, Warsaw, August 19–21, 2017. Warsaw, EDP Sciences, 2017; 00164. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201711700164
13. Wolff M., Dagmar H. Mediating sustainability and liveability — turning points of green space supply in European cities. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2019; 7:61. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00061
14. Liu M., Li X., Song D., Zhai H. Evaluation and monitoring of urban public greenspace planning using landscape metrics in Kunming. Sustainability. 2021; 13(7):3704. DOI: 10.3390/su13073704
15. Novoselova I.Yu. Optimization of the green shield of the city conservation process. Ecology of Urban Areas. 2018; 3:103-106. DOI: 10.24411/1816-1863-2018-13103 (rus.).
16. Telichenko V., Tesler K. The coastal territory of the Yauza river as an urban recreational carcass. IOP Conference Series : Materials Science and Engineering: 21, Construction — The Formation of Living Environment (Moscow, April 25–27, 2018). Moscow, 2018; 022070. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/365/2/022070
17. Merkulova S.V., Kochurov B.I., Merkulov P.I., Ivashkina I.V. Gardening as a factor of improving of ecological situation in the urban areas (for example, the city of Saransk). Ecology of Urban Areas. 2018; 3:13-18. DOI: 10.24411/1816-1863-2018-13013 (rus.).
18. Rumyantsev D.E., Frolova V.A. Methodological approaches to studying diversity of ecosystem services of greeneries in metropolitan city. International Research Journal. 2019; 10(88):28-34. DOI: 10.23670/IRJ.2019.88.10.028. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/metodologicheskie-podhody-k-izucheniyu-raznoobraziya-ekosistemnyh-uslug-zelenyh-nasazhdeniy-v-megapolise (rus.).
19. Klimanova O.A., Illarionova O.I. Green infrastruc ture indicators for urban planning: applying the integrated approach for Russian largest cities. Geography, Environment, Sustainability. 2020; 13(1):251-259. (rus.).
20. D’yachkova O.N. Required specialists to ensure the life cycle of urban green spaces. Ecology of Urban Areas. 2022; 2:27-33. DOI: 10.24412/1816-1863-2022-2-27-33 (rus.).
21. D’yachkova O.N. Green space in the improvement system of adjacent territory (private) areas of apartment buildings. Geoekologiya. 2022; 1:85-95. DOI: 10.31857/S0869780922010039 (rus.).
22. Mouromtzev D.I., Sender A.V., Chirkin A.M., Lisitsa N.I. Automatic analysis of local routes and adjacent house territory for urban planning support. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics. 2017; 17(1):75-80. DOI: 10.17586/2226-1494-2017-17-1-75-80 URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/avtomaticheskiy-analiz-lokalnyh-marshrutov-i-pridomovoy-territorii-dlya-podderzhki-planirovaniya-gorodskogo-rayona (rus.).
23. D’yachkova O.N., Mikhailov A.E. Methodology for estimation of recreational load on local parks. Biospheric Compatibility: Human, Region, Technologies. 2022; 3(39):121-133. DOI: 10.21869/2311-1518-2022-38-3-121-133 (rus.).
24. D’yachkova O.N., Mikhailov A.E., Yakunina G.V. Experience of assessment of the attractiveness of district parks in Saint Petersburg. Urban Sociology. 2022; 3:49-63. DOI: 10.35211/19943520_2022_3_49. URL: https://elibrary.ru/tyskct (rus.).
25. Danilina N., Tsurenkova K., Berkovich V. Evaluating urban green public spaces: the case study of Krasnodar region cities, Russia. Sustainability. 2021; 13(24):14059. DOI: 10.3390/su132414059
26. Zhang J., Yue W., Fan P., Gao J. Measuring the accessibility of public green spaces in urban areas using web map services. Applied Geography. 2021; 126:102381. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102381
27. D’yachkova O.N., Mikhailov A.E. Sociological research of residents’ preferences toward inclusive green spaces in city. Real Estate: Economics, Management. 2022; 3:47-51. URL: https://n-eu.iasv.ru/index.php/neu/issue/view/20/27
28. Noulas A., Scellato S., Lambiotte R., Pontil M., Mascolo C. A tale of many cities: universal patterns in human urban mobility. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(5):e37027. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037027
29. Orozco L.G.N., Alessandretti L., Saberi M., Szell M., Battiston F. Multimodal Urban Mobility and Multilayer Transport Networks. 2021. URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.02152.pdf
30. Ushakov D.E., Karelin D.V. The evaluation of the resident demand for underground railways within walking distance of stations. Construction: Science and Education. 2022; 12(1):1. URL: http://www.nso-journal.ru/public/journals/1/issues/2022/01/2305-5502.2022.1.1.pdf DOI: 10.22227/2305-5502.2022.1.1 (rus.).
31. Danilina N.V., Rudenko S.S., Yazberdieva G.A. Accessibility evaluation of stopping points for ground urban public transport stops with the use of geographic information systems. Real Estate: Economics, Management. 2020; 1:36-41. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42669873 (rus.).
32. Kudryavtsev D., Gavrilova T., Smirnova M., Golovacheva K. Modelling consumer knowledge: the role of ontology. Procedia Computer Science. 2020; 176:500-507. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.08.052
33. Danilina N.V. Sustainable development of cultural and historical landscapes of cities. Actual Problems of the Construction Industry and Education — 2021 : collection of Reports of the Second National Scientific Conference, Moscow, December 08, 2021. Moscow, National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, 2022; 379-385 (rus.).
34. Pospelov D.A. Knowledge engineering. Science and Life. 1987; 6:11-24 (rus.).
35. Kudryavtsev D.V., Gavrilova T.A., Smirnova M.M., Golovacheva K.S. Building ontology of consumer knowledge in marketing: cross-disciplinary approach. Iskusstvenniy Intellekt i Prinyatie Resheniy/Artificial Intelligence and Decision Making. 2021; 3:19-32. DOI: 10.14357/20718594210302.URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46701359 (rus.).
36. Alexander Ch. A Pattern Language. Towns. Bildings. Construction. New York, Oxford University Press, 1977.
Review
For citations:
D’yachkova O.N., Mikhailov A.E. Management of urban public green spaces. Construction: Science and Education. 2023;13(1):152-173. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2023.1.11
Views:
512
Email this article 
