An algorithm for evaluating the cost effectiveness of the facility under design for students with major in architecture

Introduction.

It is obviously essential to form economic thinking among students with major in architecture. The notion of the cost effectiveness of the elements of the projected residential environment determines a comprehensive approach to the architectural planning of residential construction with due regard to: requirements for land use planning and urban development zoning, based on building types varying in their use, form of property, services, functionality, number of floors and quality classes; transport and pedestrian traffic, which provides an optimal access to the external supporting infrastructure; landscape planning requirements of sustainable environment. The practical relevance of methodological recommendations lies in the use of the algorithm for evaluating the facility under design, which provides for an effective model of economic development of residential construction. The purpose of methodological recommendations is to illustrate the cost effectiveness of the most appropriate design solution, which covers scientifically based estimation designing criteria in terms of cost indicators, results and the payback period of the implemented investment and construction project. The scientific novelty involves the development of the Algorithm as well as the Procedure for evaluation of a comprehensive cost-effective design model within the scope of architectural planning of residential areas.

Materials and methods.

The following materials were used: methodological recommendations, rules and regulations, regulations on the permitted use of land plots and capital structures of the Rules for land use and development, the Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation, regulations on marginal construction costs. Within the scope of reviewing regulatory documents, methods of comparative and absolute effectiveness, the analysis and synthesis of methods for planning, designing and implementing remodeled and new architectural and construction facilities were applied.

Results.

Scientifically based proposals on the application of the Algorithm of organizational and methodical phases for comprehensive cost-effective modeling of a residence building.

Conclusions.

The hypothesis regarding the creation of an algorithm for evaluating cost effectiveness of residential construction development has been confirmed.

1. Кирюшечкина Л.И. Трансформация методов оценки экономической эффективности // Наука, образование и экспериментальное проектирование в МАРХИ : тезисы докл. Междунар. науч.-практ. конф., профессорско-преподавательского состава, молодых ученых и студентов. 2018. С. 221-222.

2. Калашов Д.Т. Предпроектный анализ как неотъемлемая часть процесса проектирования // Наука, образование и экспериментальное проектирование в МАРХИ : тезисы докл. Междунар. науч.-практ. конф., профессорско-преподавательского состава, молодых ученых и студентов. 2018. С. 229-230.

3. Завыленков С.А. О интеграции общественных функций в городское жилище // Вестник евразийской науки. 2018. Т. 10. № 4. С. 24.

4. Парамонова Э.С., Солодилова Л.А. Инвестиционная привлекательность освобождаемых и реорганизованных территорий в г. Москве для реализации проектов природопользования и функционального перепрофилирования объектов капитального строительства // Наука, образование и экспериментальное проектирование в МАРХИ : тезисы докл. Междунар. науч.-практ. конф., профессорско-преподавательского состава, молодых ученых и студентов. 2018. С. 225-226.

5. Демин Д.Н., Солодилова Л.А. Функционально-планировочная организация учреждений дополнительного образования и воспитания по месту жительства // Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. 2018. № 2 (43). С. 185-196.

6. Титаренко Н.В. Экономико-управленческая подготовка архитектора: от образовательных стандартов к профессиональной архитектурной практике // Экономика образования. 2018. № 4 (107). С. 51-69.

7. Титаренко Н.В. Развитие экономических компетенций в подготовке и профессиональной конкурентоспособности архитекторов // Конкурентоспособность в глобальном мире: экономика, наука, технологии. 2017. № 5-3 (45). С. 143-147.

8. Усманова В.А. Оценка экономической эффективности экологической архитектуры урбанизированных территорий // Уральская горная школа - регионам : сб. докл. Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. 2017. С. 677-678.

9. Корольченко Д.А., Холщевников В.В. Дифференциация концепции системного подхода к анализу городской среды // Пожаровзрывобезопасность. 2015. Т. 24. № 7. С. 41-51. DOI: 10.18322/PVB.2015.24.07.44-51

10. Вавилова Т.Я. Обзор современных зарубежных концепций экологизации среды жизнедеятельности // Градостроительство и архитектура. 2019. Т. 9. № 3 (36). С. 113-125. DOI: 10.17673/Vestnik.2019.03.15

11. Saltykov I., Bovsunovskaya M. The quality estimation of exterior wall’s and window filling’s construction design // IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2017. Vol. 90. P. 012173. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/90/1/012173

12. Ekhina M.P., Solodilova L.A. Exposition-educational centers of national arts and crafts // IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018. Vol. 365. P. 022008. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/365/2/022008

13. Klochko A.R. Economy Class Hotels on the Cities Embankments // Materials Science Forum. 2018. Vol. 931. Pp. 785-789. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.931.785

14. Bancerova O. To the problem of the use of forming principles in the residential buildings architecture with regard to the energy efficiency // MATEC Web of Conferences. 2017. Vol. 106. P. 01034. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201710601034

15. Alanne K., Schade J., Martinac I., Saari A., Jokisalo J., Kalamees T. Economic viability of energy-efficiency measures in educational buildings in Finland // Advances in Building Energy Research. 2013. Vol. 7. Issue 1. Pp. 120-127. DOI: 10.1080/17512549.2013.809272

16. Yuzhakov Y., Belkin A. Construction strengthening in historical wooden cupolas restoration // IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018. Vol. 365. P. 052017. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/365/5/052017

17. Borsoi G. Nanostructured lime-based materials for the conservation of calcareous substrates // A+Be and the Built Environment. 2017. No. 8. Pp. 1-202. DOI: 10.7480/abe.2017.8

18. Pronina T. Elements of architectural and artistic expressiveness of urban highways // IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018. Vol. 365. P. 022011. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/365/2/022011

19. Nguyen Van T., Nguyen Hieu T., De Troyer F. Managing pile foundation and land cost for high-rise buildings in the early design stages // Architectural Engineering and Design Management. 2016. Vol. 12. Issue 3. Pp. 151-169. DOI: 10.1080/17452007.2016.1140016

20. Bovsunovskaya M. Document support of cost management in underground construction projects // Procedia Engineering. 2016. Vol. 165. Pp. 960-964. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.806

21. Kankhva V., Orlov B., Vorobyeva A., Belyaeva S., Petrosyan R. The formation of a criteria-based approach in the development of projects of redevelopment of industrial real estate // MATEC Web of Conferences. 2018. Vol. 170. P. 01116. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201817001116