Structure and content of the NPP life cycle stage management platform
https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2024.2.18-31
Abstract
Introduction. Life cycle management of nuclear power plants is a complex process for many reasons, one of which is a large amount of information that requires understanding and analysis at all stages of the life cycle (LC): from the stage of “Site placement and selection” to the final stage of “Decommissioning”. NPP lifecycle management is a multifactorial process that includes obtaining and analysing a large amount of diverse information and actions. To consider all the details of this complex LC management process, it is necessary to create a digital platform, and to facilitate the process of information processing and management of NPP LC, a mathematical description is needed.
Materials and methods. The purpose of this paper is to substantiate the need to create a management platform for NPP LC from the stage of placement to the stage of decommissioning. The elements of the management platform should be used in the implementation of strategic planning when making long-term decisions aimed at ensuring safety, given that the decommissioning of the plant is the most high-risk stage of the NPP housing and communal services.
Results. The paper discusses the basics of creating an NPP LC management platform, including a mathematical description and algorithms of the methodology for managing it, presents the structure and image of the platform and provides an example of risk management.
Conclusions. The structure and content of the NPP LC management platform are proposed, which combines all stages of the NPP life cycle, consolidates and systematizes information about all events and elements in digital format, considering factors: safety, cost, durability, time, the platform allows for analysis and evaluation of NPP LC stages.
About the Authors
Mohammad Alshraideh
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mohammad Alshraideh — postgraduate student of the Department of Construction of Thermal and Atomic Power Stations
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
I. А. Engovatov
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Igor А. Engovatov — Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Construction of Thermal and Atomic Power Stations
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
Scopus: 6507232254, ResearcherID: AFN-5363-2022
A. А. Morozenko
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey А. Morozenko — Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head Department of the Department of Construction of Thermal and Atomic Power Stations
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
Scopus: 57193025936, ResearcherID: AFO-1863-2022
References
1. Alshraideh M., Engovatov I.A. Classification of risks at the stages of the life cycle of a nuclear power plant. The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2023; 15(2). EDN NSKKXE (rus.).
2. Alshraydekh M., Engovatov I., Morozenko A. The issues of NPP life cycle management. Energy Policy. 2023; 1(179):56-71. DOI: 10.46920/2409-5516.2023_1179.56. EDN QQCRPB (rus.).
3. Clark C.R. Safe and effective nuclear power plant life cycle management towards decommissioning. IAEA-TECDOC-1305. International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA. 2002; 1-30.
4. Nuclear power plant life management and longer-term operation. Nuclear Development. 2006. DOI: 10.1787/9789264029255-en
5. Alshraideh M., Engovatov I.A., Morozenko A.А. Analysing methods of risk identification and ranking in the life cycle of nuclear power plants. Construction: Science and Education. 2023; 13(4):128-141. DOI: 10.22227/2305-5502.2023.4.9. EDN UIZFWP. (rus.).
6. Kang K.S., Clark C.R., Omoto A. Integrated plant life management (PLiM). The IAEA Contribution. 2005.
7. Schlissel D., Biewald B. Nuclear power plant construction costs. Synapse Energy Economics. 2008.
8. Jeffrey C.S. Mega-project construction management: the Corps of Engineers and Bechtel Group in Saudi Arabia : thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1991.
9. Hopkin P. Fundamentals of risk management: understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management. Kogan Page Publishers, 2018.
10. Dobryakhina O.P. Problems and risks of implementing megaprojects in Russia. The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2022; 14(6). DOI: 10.15862/03ECVN622. EDN ILOWQL (rus.).
11. Sarkar A., Mukhopadhyay A.R., Ghosh S.K. Issues in Pareto analysis and their resolution. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. 2013; 24(5-6):641-651. DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2012.704265
12. Lotov A.V., Pospelova I.I. Multicriteria decision-making problems : textbook. Moscow, Max-Press, 2008; 196. (rus.).
13. Schuler R.S., Budhwar P.S., Florkowski G.W. International human resource management : review and critique. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2002; 4(1):41-70. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2370.00076
14. Wiley C. International human resource management edited by Anne-Wil Harzing and Joris Van Ruysseveldt. Journal of Global Business. 1996; 7:66-68.
15. Lidskog R., Andersson A.C. The management of radioactive waste. A description of ten countries. Svensk Karnbranslehantering AB, 2002.
16. Efremenkov V.M. Radioactive waste management at nuclear power plants. IAEA Bulletin. 1989; 31(4):37-42.
17. Gonzalez A.J. The safety of radioactive waste management. IAEA Bulletin. 2000; 42(3).
18. Kravchuk M. Development of indicators system of NPP safety. East European Journal of Advanced Technologies. 2012; 2(8):(56):4-11. EDN XRJKKF (rus.).
19. Lukashin A.F. Optimization of the economic efficiency of an enterprise using the example of existing performance indicators. Young Scientist. 2016; 8(112):578-580. EDN VWGBUJ (rus.).
20. Parhachova A., Fedoskin N. State environmental management. Theoretical Aspects of Juriprudence and Issues of Law Enforcement : collection of articles based on the materials of the XXX international scientific and practical conference. 2019; 129-133. EDN FUFXOH (rus.).
21. Semashkina Z. Material consumption in industrial production: the content and evolution of the views. The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2014; 4(23):43. EDN TCFMLP (rus.).
22. Borgström F., Karlsson L., Ortsäter G., Norton N., Halbout P., Cooper C. et al. Fragility fractures in Europe: burden, management and opportunities. Archives of Osteoporosis. 2020; 15(1). DOI: 10.1007/s11657-020-0706-y
23. Greenley G.E., Foxall G.R. Multiple stakeholder orientation in UK companies and the implications for company performance. Journal of Management Studies. 1997; 34(2):259-284. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00051
24. Danelyan T.Ya. Formal methods of expert estimations. Statistics and Economics. 2015; 1:183-187. EDN TQJPJL (rus.).
25. Vaidya O.S., Kumar S. Analytic hierarchy process : an overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research. 2006; 169(1):1-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
26. Saaty T.L. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The Journal of the Operational Research Society. 1980; 41(11):1073-1076.
27. Seising R., Trillas E., Kacprzyk J. Towards the future of fuzzy logic. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-18750-1
28. Kahraman C. Fuzzy Multi-criteria decision making: theory and applications with recent developments. Springer Optimization and Its Applications. 2008. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-76813-7
29. Zimakov A.V. Nuclear decommisioning in the EU: financing issues. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law. 2022; 15(1):186-202. DOI: 10.31249/kgt/2022.01.09. EDN FHPKZC (rus.).
Review
For citations:
Alshraideh M., Engovatov I.А., Morozenko A.А. Structure and content of the NPP life cycle stage management platform. Construction: Science and Education. 2024;14(2):18-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2024.2.18-31
Views:
373
Email this article 
