Constructive solutions applicable for restoration of wooden household buildings on the example of the shop of the Glukharev merchants in Pereslavl-Zalessky
https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2025.2.3
Abstract
Introduction. Preservation of cultural heritage is an urgent task of modern society. Its necessity is also stated in the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 02.07.2021 № 400 “The National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation”: “...strengthening of traditional Russian spiritual and moral values, preservation of cultural and historical heritage of the people of Russia”. It is also clear that Russian society is aware of the importance of preserving the architectural cultural heritage of our country. Voluntary expeditions and other activities are carried out in order to preserve cultural heritage objects, as well as old houses that are not included in the register. The research of Glukharev merchants’ shop is a part of the historical and architectural research of the Rybatskaya Sloboda in Pereslavl-Zalessky. In this place the historical appearance is still preserved as well as features connected with the historically developed trade specialization of the sloboda. The research is devoted to one of the old economic buildings of the sloboda — a trading shop. This object is a rare valuable building. It is in an emergency condition and requires urgent intervention of specialists. The methods applicable to the restoration of wooden outbuildings are considered. The possibility of using each method for the shop of the Glukharev merchants is evaluated, and also design solutions of structures are proposed and the most rational solution is determined. The choice of the restoration method determines the duration, labour and economic costs of the work and depends mainly on the condition of the building and its conservation status.
Materials and methods. Old houses of Rybatskaya Sloboda, archival sources, scientific works, normative documents were analyzed. A field study of the building was carried out, in the course of which measurements were made, photo-fixation was made, the condition of the structures was assessed, and the calculation of the structures was carried out.
Results. The options for reinforcing the bench roof structures were investigated and the cross-sections of the structures were selected for the most optimal option.
Conclusions. The best option turned out to be the roof reinforcement with struts and underpinnings with cross sections of 30 × 30 and 40 × 40.
About the Authors
V. S. SkvortsovaRussian Federation
Vitalina S. Skvortsova — student
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
A. Yu. Ushakov
Russian Federation
Andrey Yu. Ushakov — Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Metal and Wooden Structures
26 Yaroslavskoe shosse, Moscow, 129337
References
1. Skvortsova V.S., Chastova V.Yu., Zinina O.A. Full-scale studies of the wooden shop of the Glukharev merchants in Pereslavl-Zalessky. Days of Student Science : collection of reports of the scientific and technical conference on the results of research works by students of the Institute of Construction and Architecture of the National Research University MGSU. 2024. (rus.).
2. Skvortsova V.S., Chastova V.Yu., Salviyan S.M. Reconstruction of the Glukharev merchants’ shop in Pereslavl-Zalessky. Days of Student Science : collection of reports of the scientific and technical conference on the results of research works by students of the Institute of Construction and Architecture of the National Research University MGSU. 2024. (rus.).
3. Bode A. Methods of the Restoration of Wooden Architectural Monuments in Russia. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Architecture: Heritage, Traditions and Innovations (AHTI 2019). 2019. DOI: 10.2991/ahti-19.2019.66
4. Khodakovsky E. Wooden Church Architecture of the Russian North. Regional Schools and Traditions (14th – 19th centuries). London, Routledge, 2015; 192. DOI: 10.4324/9781315723181
5. Medvedeva M. The Imperial Archaeological commission (1859–1918) and cultural heritage management in Russia. Architectural Conservation and Restoration in Norway and Russia. 2017; 38-55. DOI: 10.4324/9781315276205-4
6. Kolyada M.I. Monument of folk wooden architecture in the village of Yuksovichi. Problems of the history and culture of the North-West of the RSFSR. Leningrad, Publishing house of Leningrad University, 1977; 59-62. (rus.).
7. Khodakovsky E.V. Wooden church architecture of the Russian North in 19th – early 20th cenrtury. St. Petersburg, 2022; 799. (rus.).
8. Haupts H. Historical timber and earthen constructions in Norway Vapour permeable surfaces — restoration challenges. 10th International Conference Diyarbakır Turkey. 2023
9. Manara N., Rosset L., Zambelli F., Zanola A., Califano A. Natural climate reconstruction in the Norwegian stave churches through time series processing with variational autoencoders. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation. 2024; 42(1):18-34. DOI: 10.1108/ijbpa-01-2022-0017
10. Pryadko I., Lebedev I. Wood as a Material of Traditional Manor Building: Problems of Restoration, Conservation and Reconstruction. IOP Conference Series : Materials Science and Engineering. 2021; 1079(3):032022. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/1079/3/032022. EDN DLEATZ.
11. Khodakovsky E., Skjold Lexau S. Historic Wooden Architecture in Europe and Russia: Evidence, Study and Restoration. 2015. DOI: 10.1515/9783-035605426
12. Partov D., Grekov P., Kantchev V., Petkov M., Nikolov R. Assessment and rehabilitation of the timber roof structure of the “Assumption of the Virgin” Church in Kustendil. Annual of the University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy Sofia. 2018; 51(4):125-138.
13. Gros A., Guillem A., De Luca L. Baillieul É., Duvocelle B., Malavergne O. et al. Faceting the post-disaster built heritage reconstruction process within the digital twin framework for Notre-Dame de Paris. Scientific Reports. 2023; 13(1). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32504-9
14. De Luca L. Digital Data Working Group: A n-dimensional analysis and memorisation ecosystem for the restoration of Notre-Dame. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2022.
15. Bruseker G., Guillem A., Carboni N. Semantically Documenting Virtual Reconstruction: Building a Path to Knowledge Provenance. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 2015; II-5/W3:33-40. DOI: 10.5194/isprsannals-ii-5-w3-33-2015
16. Guillem A., Gros A., Abergel V., De Luca L. Reconstruction beyond Representation in Notre-Dame de Paris. 2023 IMEKO International Conference on Metrology for Cultural Heritage. 2023. DOI: 10.21014/tc4-ARC-2023.123
17. Kisternaya M.V., Gashkov I.G., Melnikov I.V., Nezvitskaya T.V. Restoration of the Church of the Transfiguration of the Lord on Kizhi Island. Petrozavodsk, Severny Palomnik Publishing House, 2020; 160. EDN AGLMCT. (rus.).
18. Kuznetsova T.A. Beams analysis using “Abaqus” software package. Vestnik VGAVT. 2016; 47:209-220. EDN WCAZJL. (rus.).
19. Bulbovich R.V., Pavlogradskiy V.V., Eremenko P.P. The calculation of the stress-strain state of elastic orthotropic body by finite element method. PNRPU Aerospace Engineering Bulletin. 2015; 40:92-105. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9982/2015.40.06. EDN TMJGMV. (rus.).
20. Kalonav B.Q., Sarimsoqov S.Sh., Dosaliyev K.S. Study of modern methods for calculating wooden structures in a steady-state regime. Economy and Society. 2024; 5-2(120):1114-1117. EDN WNAPIZ. (rus.).
Review
For citations:
Skvortsova V.S., Ushakov A.Yu. Constructive solutions applicable for restoration of wooden household buildings on the example of the shop of the Glukharev merchants in Pereslavl-Zalessky. Construction: Science and Education. 2025;15(2):40-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2025.2.3