Formation of urban information and communication portal

Introduction. Scheme for systematizing information and data required to create an urban planning decision support system and interrelating the main urban planning processes for developing an Urban Information and Communication Portal.

Materials and methods. The Scheme DSS in Urban Planning is a modified and generated version of existing research methods. It is based on scientific schools of organizational-action games, organizational management, methodology of information systems development, and conceptual analysis, as well as system-mind-action methodology related to situation centres.

Results. The study formed predicates of relations. The Urban Information and Communication Portal includes stakeholders from four groups involved in urban planning activities: “Public authorities”, “Businesses”, “Communities” and “Property owners”. In addition, quantifier formulas are used to make urban planning decisions for different types of territory transformation. The logical relationships between these formulas are presented in the logic of predicates. The decision-making process for urban planning on a specific territory is expressed in formula 1. The expression formula 2 is used to make an urban planning decision, while expression formula 3 confirms the existence of an urban planning decision. This decision takes into account the relevant factors of each stakeholder involved in urban planning activities and considers one or more attributes of the territory.

Conclusions. This hypothesis can serve as the foundation for developing a new digital tool, the Urban Information and Communication Portal with access to a decision support system that employs end-to-end digital technologies such as web mapping, GIS, and artificial intelligence.

1. Kolyasnikov V.A. The 20th century concepts of systemic cybernetic urban development. Architecton: Proceedings of Higher Education. 2023; 1(81). DOI: 10.47055/19904126_2023_1(81)_17. EDN PCYGRL. (rus.).

2. Joung S. Management: a systems analysis. Moscow, Sovetskoe Radio, 1972; 456. (rus.).

3. As I., Basu P., Talwar P. Artificial Intelligence in Urban Planning and Design. Elsevier, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/C2019-0-05206-5

4. Picon A., Ratti C. Atlas of the Senseable City. Yale University Press, 2023. DOI: 10.12987/9780300271737

5. Traunmueller M., Peters-Anders J., Kozlowska A., Buruzs A., Melnyk O. AI-Supported Approaches for Sustainable Urban Development: Analysis of Case Studies. Deutsche Gesellschaft four Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH and Austrian Institute of Technology, 2021. URL: https://www.readkong.com/page/ai-supported-approaches-for-sustainable-urban-development-8710363

6. As I., Pal S., Basu P. Artificial intelligence in architecture: generating conceptual design via deep learning. International Journal of Architectural Computing. 2018; 16(4):306-327. DOI: 10.1177/1478077118800982

7. Ortega-Fernández A., Martín-Rojas R., García-Morales V.J. Artificial Intelligence in the Urban Environment: Smart Cities as Models for Developing Innovation and Sustainability. Sustainability. 2020; 12(19):7860. DOI: 10.3390/su12197860

8. Pazdur-Czarnowska A. The Future of Public Spaces — towards Interactive Use of Artificial Intelligence in Urban Interiors. Space & Form. 2020; 2020:209-244. DOI: 10.21005/pif.2020.43.c-08

9. Quan S.J., Park J., Economou A., Lee S. Artificial intelligence-aided design: smart design for sustainable city development. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. 2019; 46(8):1581-1599. DOI: 10.1177/2399808319867946

10. Sanchez T.W., Shumway H., Gordner T., Lim T. The Prospects of Artificial Intelligence in Urban Planning. International Journal of Urban Sciences. 2022; 27(2):179-194. DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2022.2102538

11. Shulin L. Artificial Intelligence to Assist Urban. 2020 Conference on Social Science and Modern Science (SSMS2020). 2020. DOI: 10.38007/Proceedings.0000715

12. Yigitcanlar T., Kankanamge N., Regona M., Maldonado A.R., Rowan B., Ryu A. et al. Artificial Intelligence Technologies and Related Urban Planning and Development Concepts: How Are They Perceived and Utilized in Australia? Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2020; 6(4):187. DOI: 10.3390/joitmc6040187

13. Utami C.F., Mizuno K., Hasibuan H.S., Soesilo T.E. Discovering Spatial Development Control For Indonesia : а Systematic Literature Review. Geography, Environment, Sustainability. 2023; 15(4):64-79. DOI: 10.24057/2071-9388-2021-119

14. Yigitcanlar T., Cugurullo F. The Sustainability of Artificial Intelligence: An Urbanistic Viewpoint from the Lens of Smart and Sustainable Cities. Sustainability. 2020; 12(20):8548. DOI: 10.3390/su12208548

15. Allam Z. On Complexity, Connectivity and Autonomy in Future Cities. Sustainable Urban Futures. 2021; 31-47. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59448-0_3

16. Samoylova N.A. Decision support system in Urban planning (Science + Digital Technology). Fundamental Search and Applied Research of the RAASN on Scientific Support for the Development of Architecture, Urban Planning and the construction industry of the Russian Federation in 2022–2023 years, scientific works. Vol. 1. 2024; 574-582. (rus.).

17. Zhang Y. CityMatrix: An Urban Decision Support System Augmented by Artificial Intelligence. The MIT Press, 2017.

18. Alonso L., Zhang Y.R., Grignard A., Noyman A., Sakai Y., ElKatsha M. et al. CityScope: a data-driven interactive simulation tool for urban design. Use case volpe. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. 2018; 253-261. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-96661-8_27

19. The Politics of Mapping. Wiley-ISTE, 2022; 288. DOI: 10.1002/9781119986751

20. Della Dora V. The Mantle of the Earth: Genealogies of a Geographical Metaphor. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2020; 416.

21. Perkins C. Cartography: Mapping Theory. Progress in Human Geography. 2003; 27(3):341-351. DOI: 10.1191/0309132503ph430pr

22. Wilmott C. Mobile Mapping Space, Cartography and the Digital. Amsterdam University Press, 2020; 350. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvx8b7zc

23. Eremchenko E. Digital earth: the geospatial revolution and its worldview implications. Logos. 2023; 33(1):(152):221-241. DOI: 10.22394/0869-5377-2023-1-221-240. EDN CUHFXM. (rus.).

24. Ivanov K., Pisarev A., Gavrilenko S. On the inside of maps: critical cartography. Logos. 2023; 33(1): (152):1-32. DOI: 10.22394/0869-5377-2023-1-1-31. EDN QKPOWG. (rus.).

25. Kitchin R., Dodge M. Rethinking maps. Logos. 2023; 33(1):(152):33-60. DOI: 10.22394/0869-5377-2023-1-33-59. EDN HTXRZU. (rus.).

26. November V., Camacho-Hübner E., Latour B. Entering a risky territory: space in the age of digital navigation. Logos. 2023; 33(1):(152):61-96. DOI: 10.22394/0869-5377-2023-1-61-95. EDN MGGXUZ. (rus.).

27. Painter J. Rethinking territory. Urban Studies and Practices. 2022; 7(2):13-34. DOI: 10.17323/usp72202213-34. EDN CWVJRP. (rus.).

28. Greenhalgh P., King H. Developing an Indicator of Property Market Resilience–Investigating the Potential of GIS to Analyse Business Occupier Displacement and Property Market Filtering: A Case Study of Tyne and Wear. Urban Studies. 2013; 50(2):372-390. DOI: 10.1177/0042098012453860

29. Marsal-Llacuna M.-L., López-Ibáñez M.-B. Smart urban planning: designing urban land use from urban time use. Journal of Urban Technology. 2014; 21(1):39-56. DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2014.884385

30. Smith R.G., Doel M.A. Questioning the Theoretical Basis of Current Global-City Research: Structures, Networks and Actor-Networks. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2011; 35(1):24-39. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00940.x

31. Lynch K. The Image of the City. The MIT Press, 1960; 194.

32. Glazychev V.L., Ikonnikov A.V. The image of the city. Moscow, Stroyizdat, 1982; 328. (rus.).

33. Negroponte N. The Architecture Machine. MIT Press, 1970. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/8269.001.0001

34. Samoylova N. Urban planning and urban development of living environment using information mo-deling. Fundamental, exploratory and applied research of the Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences on scientific support for the development of architecture, urban planning and the construction industry of the Russian Federation in 2018 : collection of scientific papers of RAASN. 2019; 415-431. DOI: 10.22337/9785432303080-415-431. EDN SLXUMQ. (rus.).

35. Shchedrovitskiy G.P. Selected Writings. Moscow, Publishing House of School of Cultural Policy, 1995; 759. (rus.).

36. Nikanorov S.P. Introduction to conceptual design of automated cоntrol system: analysis and structure synthesis. Moscow, 1995. EDN QMSGXT. (rus.).

37. Matirko V.I., Polyakov V.V., Starikov I.M., Tkachenko Yu.A. A collection of business games, case studies and practical tasks. Moscow, Higher school, 1991; 254. (rus.).

38. Lepsky V.E. Analytics of assembly of the subject of development. Moscow, Kogito-Center, 2016; 130. EDN WYZIUZ. (rus.).

39. Thematic issue of essays for the 80th anniversary of Vladimir Alexandrovich Lefebvre. Reflexive Processes and Management. 2016; 16(1-2). (rus.).

40. Saaty T.L. Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making. Why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors. Cloud of Science. 2016; 3(2):171-262. EDN XDCIDF. (rus.).

41. Samoilova N.A. Russia needs a system of urban types of areas (urban units)!? Urban Development. 2019; 3(61):42-52. EDN RKEDOT. (rus.).