Preview

Construction: Science and Education

Advanced search

Theoretical and methodological approach to the formation of key settlements to ensure balanced sustainable development of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation

https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2025.4.4

Abstract

Introduction. The Spatial Development Strategy of the Russian Federation until 2030 (with a forecast until 2036) has identified the development of key settlements (hereinafter referred as KS) as one of its priorities. Despite the fact that 2,160 KS have already been identified in the Russian Federation, the task of selecting the most priority ones to ensure balanced development remains relevant. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop methodological foundations for the formation of KS in the territory of the Russian Federation constituent entity.

Materials and methods. A comprehensive assessment methodology was adapted, including relative value criteria for the selection of territory, allowing the value of a municipal formation to be determined for the subsequent selection of the KS in its territory.

Results. A methodology for determining the KS of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation is demonstrated, and a matrix of priority factors for assessing a territory with the aim of assigning it the status of a key settlement of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation is being developed. As part of the implementation of the developed theoretical and methodological toolkit, presented electronic maps of the comprehensive assessment of the territory of the Rostov region. A settlement system was developed on the example of the village of Belaya Kalitva and the surrounding areas.

Conclusions. The developed toolkit is intended to improve the scientific and methodological framework for making decisions on determining the KS, highlighting priorities for development in the context of limited material and time resources, as well as the instability of the economic situation. The methodological framework is characterized by its universality due to the use of standard methods in a new combination and interpretation.

About the Authors

A. A. Fedorovskaya
Don State Technical University (DSTU)
Russian Federation

Albina A. Fedorovskaya — Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Urban Construction and Management

1 Gagarin square, Rostov-on-Don, 344000



D. S. Vyshlova
Center for Information Support of Urban Development Activities
Russian Federation

Daria S. Vyshlova — chief specialist

12 Voroshilovsky avenue, Rostov-on-Don, 344006



References

1. Evlampieva E.V. Key settlements in the conditions of spatial development of the Russian Federation. Business. Education. Right. 2025; 2(71):147-152. DOI: 10.25683/VOLBI.2025.71.1315. EDN OXYXND. (rus.).

2. Nefedova T.G., Glezer O.B. Transformation of Russia’s social-geographical space. Challenges and Policy of Russia’s Spatial Development in the 21st Century. 2020; 214-251. EDN FSZDAW. (rus.).

3. Tsyrenov D.D., Saveliev S.A. The main stages of the formation of theories of regional and territorial development. Naukosfera. 2024; 6-2:454-459. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.12645126. EDN ETLCZD. (rus.).

4. Gamidullaeva L.A., Grosheva E.S., Belogradova O.A., Shevchenko D.N. Balanced development of the territory: approaches to determination and assessment. Models, Systems, Networks in Economics, Engineering, Nature and Society. 2022; 3(43):25-41. DOI: 10.21685/2227-8486-2022-3-2. EDN WJKLDE. (rus.).

5. Korobov V.B., Kochurov B.I., Lokhov A.S., Tutygin A.G. Geographical Objects as Systems: Adequate Properties and Functions. Geography and Natural Resources. 2023; 44(4):306-313. DOI: 10.1134/s187537282304008x

6. Korobeinikova A., Danilina N., Teplova I. Planning Public Space Climate Comfortability: A GIS-Based Algorithm for the Compact Cities of the Far North. Land. 2024; 13(11):1763. DOI: 10.3390/land13111763

7. Christaller W. How i discovered the theory of central places: a report about the origin of central places. Urban Studies and Practices. 2024; 9(1):6-14. DOI: 10.17323/usp9120246-14. EDN DZLDJY. (rus.).

8. Lappo G.M. The concept of a basic skeleton of the economic spatial structure: development, theoretical and practical role. Bulletin of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Geographical Series. 1983; 5:16-28. EDN JDSFWA. (rus.).

9. Khorev B.S. Territorial organization of society: (current problems of regional management and planning in the USSR). Moscow, Mysl, 1981; 320. (rus.).

10. Yolshina A.A. Urban agglomerations: theoretical problems and the analysis of foreign experience. Modern scientific researches and innovations. 2015; 7-3(51):53-59. EDN UHWIBV. (rus.).

11. Sadkovskaya O.E. Asymmetry of the settlement system in the Rostov region: problem statement. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. 2025; 1(70):158-172. DOI: 10.24412/1998-4839-2025-1-158-172. EDN OHQYEH. (rus.).

12. Markwart E., Kiseleva N.N., Sosnin D.P. The system of central (reference) settlements as a management tool: theoretical and practical aspects. The Authority. 2022; 30(2):95-111. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v30i2.8939. EDN UNFDYM. (rus.).

13. Roy O.M., Bichun V.S. Reference settlement in the context of Russia’s new spatial strategy. Municipal Academy. 2025; 3:81-89. DOI: 10.52176/2304831X_2025_03_81. EDN PDPOLU. (rus.).

14. Artemova E.I., Plotnikova E.V., Litra E.N. Support settlements as an institute of complex development of rural areas. International Agricultural Journal. 2025; 2(404):169-173. DOI: 10.55186/25876740_2025_68_2_169. EDN LSDTBR. (rus.).

15. Artemova O.V. Project-based approach to urban environment quality management: searching for new opportunities. Bulletin of SUSU. Series “Economics and Management”. 2025; 19(2):29-40. DOI: 10.14529/em250203. EDN SPQQAM. (rus.).

16. Pekurovskiy D.A., Kontsevaya S.Yu. Trends in spatial changes in rural areas. Agrarian Science. 2023; 3:128-131. DOI: 10.32634/0869-8155-2023-368-3-128-131. EDN SDIEJE. (rus.).

17. Evsyukova T.G., Simonovsky N.A. The social infrastructure of rural areas: the state and the prospects of development. Economics, Labor, Management in Agriculture. 2025; 8(126):213-221. DOI: 10.33938/258-213. EDN XYLPWS. (rus.).

18. Berendeeva A.B., Rychikhina N.S. Sustainable development and esg transformation of small towns: theories, concepts, approaches. News of higher educational institutions. The series “Economics, Finance and production management”. 2025; 2(64):71-82. DOI: 10.6060/ivecofin.2025642.724. EDN HJSGZK. (rus.).

19. Sadkovskaya O.Ye. “New urban planning policy” in the Rostov region. Architecton: Proceedings of Higher Education. 2023; 4(84). DOI: 10.47055/19904126_2023_4(84)_13. EDN VEYCRJ. (rus.).

20. Glichich-Zolotareva M.V. Spatial development strategy of the Russian Federation: new approaches (Russia, Moscow). Problems of Modern Economics. 2024; 4(92):10-13. EDN RMMYGG. (rus.).

21. Makhmudov R.K., Eshrokov V.M., Cherkasov A.A., Turun P.P., Lutsenko D.A. GIS-modeling of the Stavropol Krai Budyonnovsky municipal district local settlement systems. Geodesy and Cartography. 2023; 84(10):29-38. DOI: 10.22389/0016-7126-2023-1000-10-29-38. EDN WAZOHI. (rus.).

22. Kramarov S., Mityasova O., Temkin I., Khra­mov V. Objects’ identification in geospatial sociotechnical systems. Moscow, OOO “RIOR Publishing Center”, 2024; 186. DOI: 10.29039/02146-0. EDN JDRINK. (rus.).

23. Medvedeva L.S., Zemlyakova N.S. Diagnostics of socio-demographic security of the region. Science Almanac of Black Sea Region Countries. 2025; 11(1):13-21. DOI: 10.23947/2414-1143-2025-11-1-13-21. EDN UWITRF. (rus.).

24. Kabakova S.I. Urban development assessment of city territories. Moscow, Stroyizdat, 1971; 153. (rus.).

25. Romm A.P. Mathematical and modeling foundations of complex assessment and functional zoning of urban areas. Assessment Issues. 1997; 4:2-11. EDN ONZNRH. (rus.).

26. Bakaeva N.V., Chernyaeva I.V. Principles of assessing the effectiveness of urban development in Russia. Economics of Construction and Nature Management. 2022; 1-2(82-83):134-144. EDN IPPQYK. (rus.).

27. Fedorovskaya A.A., Gladysheva O.D. A simulation model for assessing the impact of the renewable energy facilities on the ecological condition of a subject of the Russian Federation. Modern Trends in Construction, Urban and Territorial Planning. 2024; 3(3):49-60. DOI: 10.23947/2949-1835-2024-3-3-49-60. EDN EOFJCQ. (rus.).

28. Ioseliani N.A. Methodological approaches to estimated zoning for the purposes of state cadastre evaluation. Property Relations in the Russian Federation. 2018; 7(202):41-49. DOI: 10.24411/2072-4098-2018-17002. EDN XTUGOL. (rus.).

29. Sheina S.G., Umnyakova N.P., Zilberova I.Yu., Fedorovskaya A.A., Girya L.V., Khorenkov S.V. et al. Sustainable development of the construction industry taking into account climate change. Rostov-on-Don, Don State Technical University, 2024; 160. EDN VCPGST. (rus.).

30. Ermolaeva S.V., Kochurov B.I. Natural landscape differentiation and natural sustainability of regional ecosystems. Ecology of Urban Areas. 2024; 1:23-30. DOI: 10.24412/1816-1863-2024-1-23-30. EDN DFATAS. (rus.).

31. Gertsberg L.Ya. Towards balanced spatial development of Russian Federation. Academia. Architecture and Construction. 2024; 1:122-130. DOI: 10.22337/2077-9038-2024-1-122-130. EDN UYUKFD. (rus.).


Review

For citations:


Fedorovskaya A.A., Vyshlova D.S. Theoretical and methodological approach to the formation of key settlements to ensure balanced sustainable development of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation. Construction: Science and Education. 2025;15(4):44-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2025.4.4

Views: 133

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2305-5502 (Online)