Preview

Construction: Science and Education

Advanced search

Principles of space planning solutions applicable to low-rise buildings in Kesab, Syria

https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2020.3.2

Abstract

Introduction.

Latakia Governorate, Syria, includes Kesab located in a mountainous area. Plains, that are good for construction purposes, are depleted; therefore, mountain slopes have to accommodate new construction projects. The analysis of space planning solutions, designated for single-family residential houses, was performed with regard for the terrain of Kesab. This analysis underlies the fundamental principles of the architectural solutions that take account of the following factors: the slope type/orientation, the layout of buildings in relation to the slope and access routes, the use of the “bearing floor” design system that reduces construction costs, the use of cantilever solutions for first floors, the availability of summer premises protected from overheating in the Kesab climate, the orientation of the slope towards cardinal points, and traditions of Arabic families. Principles of architectural design of single-family residential houses with account taken of the local terrain constitute the subject of this research. The objective is to develop recommendations designated for architectural solutions for single-family residential houses to be built in the mountainous environment of Kesab, to assure indoor comfort depending on the earth grade and terrain orientation towards cardinal points, and to reduce construction costs.

Materials and methods.

The research is based on the analysis of the Kesab terrain, the analysis of potential construction work to be performed on the slopes having different orientations, the use of the “bearing floor” structural system, the analysis of effective Syrian and Russian regulations and data sources.

Results.

As a result of research into a single-family residential house built with regard for the Kesab terrain in Syria, the co-authors developed design principles applicable to single-family residential houses in the areas featuring rough terrain.

Conclusions.

The recommendations are designated for low-rise single-family houses that have different orientations towards cardinal points in the areas that have varied earth grades like Kesab located in the mountain valley.

About the Authors

Yara Saoud
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation


Tatiana R. Zabalueva
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)
Russian Federation


References

1. Diyar Hassan Al-Karim. Environmental geography, Janadriyah. 2015. Pp. 36-48.

2. Lionello P. The Climate of the Mediterranean Region. Elsevier, 2012. Pp. 212-215.

3. Забалуева Т.Р., Захаров А.В. «Несущий этаж» - это новая свобода планировочных решений // Новый дом. 2002. № 4. С. 44-47.

4. Ibrahem Hasan Muhammad. Arab World and Mediterranean Geography. Alexandria, 2001. 110 p.

5. Hoda Sulom. The village of Lattakia between Traditions and architecture. Damascus, 2013. Pp. 22-41.

6. Header Naisa. Photos of Lattakia countryside. Lattakia, 1996. Pp. 33-52.

7. Суворов В.О. Типология объемно-планировочных решений жилища для территорий со сложным рельефом // Архитектон: известия вузов. 2014. № 47. С. 80-93.

8. Горниак Л. Использование территории со сложным рельефом под жилую застройку. М. : Стройиздат, 1982. 72 с.

9. Курбатов В.В. Градостроительство в горной местности. M. : Знание, 1987. 61 с.

10. Микаэлян М., Саркисян Э. Влияние рельефа на структуру малоэтажных домов и квартир // Архитектура СССР. 1977. № 2. С. 21-28.

11. Забалуева Т.Р., Захаров А.В. О некоторых инновационных процессах в современном коттеджном строительстве России // Budownictwo o zoptymalizowanym potencjale energetycznym. 2012. № 1 (9). С. 128-133.

12. Патент № 2536594 РФ. Здание с большепролетным помещением / А.В. Захаров, Т.Р. Забалуева, А.Д. Ишков. Патентообл. А.В. Захаров, Т.Р. Забалуева, А.Д. Ишков; заявл. № 2013140060 29.08.2013, опубл. 27.10.2014.

13. Калабин А.В. Малоэтажные жилые дома на сложном рельефе в условиях Урала. Рекомендации по проектированию (часть 1) // Академический вестник УралНИИпроект РААСН. 2013. № 2. С. 28-34.

14. Дыховичный Ю.А. Архитектурные конструкции малоэтажных жилых зданий. М. : Архитектура-С, 2006. С. 63-83.

15. Максимова М.В., Немцева О.Г. Конструктивные особенности проектирования зданий в условиях жаркого климата // Вестник СибАДИ. 2017. № 4-5 (56-57). С. 126-134.

16. Гамзаев Ш.Р. Регулирование микроклимата жилой застройки в условиях сложного рельефа и жаркого климата: на примере Дагестана : дис.. канд. техн. наук. М. : МГСУ, 2005. 19 с.

17. Нанасова С.М. Конструкции малоэтажных жилых домов. М., 2005. С. 29-34.

18. Navarra A., Tubiana L. Regional Assessment of Climate Change in the Mediterranean. Springer, 2013. Pp. 217-220. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5769-1

19. Забалуева Т.Р., Юсфи Р.А. Традиционное арабское жилище и современное жилищное строительство в Сирии // Промышленное и гражданское строительство. 2016. № 3. С. 10-14.

20. Калабин А.В. Террасно-блокированные жилые дома для эффективной застройки склонов // Академический вестник УралНИИпроект РААСН. 2011. № 1. С. 54-56.


Review

For citations:


Saoud Ya., Zabalueva T.R. Principles of space planning solutions applicable to low-rise buildings in Kesab, Syria. Construction: Science and Education. 2020;10(3):17-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/2305-5502.2020.3.2

Views: 246


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2305-5502 (Online)